The main resource of OTG is land and the most effective management of this resource provides an opportunity to fill the local budget, develop the community, carry out error-free and as clear as possible land management, complying with current legislation while taking into account the interests of the community. It also provides transparency in land management, which increases public confidence in local authorities. If as of today OTG is not provided with complete and up-to-date information on the condition, qualitative and quantitative indicators of community land resources. This does not meet the challenges of today. The lack of an updated cartographic basis and land inventory causes: inability to carry out the process of strategic planning of settlements and communities in general, inability to attract investment, low investment attractiveness of the territory, inability to manage land resources in full, inability to meet the needs of the population. OTG land inventory will allow for a full audit of land resources, and will develop community infrastructure, increase investment attractiveness, will identify all problems that have arisen regarding the management of the community.

Annotation.Taking into account the fact that the soil appraisal data is the basis for the economic valuation of agricultural land, and the data on the economic valuation of land is the basis for the normative monetary valuation of land plots, that is, there is a single, continuous methodological process of land valuation in which the data are unreliable in the first stage generates calculation errors in the following stages. Since the issue of soil appraisal in the conditions of market land relations does not lose its relevance, and taking into account that the last time work on soil appraisal of agricultural lands in Ukraine was carried out in 1993, and over the past quarter century, formally, should already be carried out, at least three new soil appraisal tours, as it is prescribed in the Law of Ukraine "On land valuation", but in fact, the soil appraisal indicators were not updated for various reasons. The authors analyzed the database of soil assessment in Ukraine according to 1993 scales, as well as the explications of agro-industrial groups of soils of natural agricultural regions (NAR) for the stock materials of the Institute of Land Management of the UAAS, on the basis of which an attempt was made to determine the completeness of the soil cover of the NAR of Ukraine for the indicators of assessment . The study shows that the indicators of soil appraisal on the materials of the Institute of Land Management of the UAAS in their completeness far from always can serve as the basis for a continuous monetary assessment of agricultural land and require research using new approaches and developments.

The coordinate basis for the implementation of land management works is the State Geodetic Reference System of the USC-2000 coordinates. However, as practice of land management shows, public information from the State Land Cadastre is reflected in the coordinate system of 1963 (SC-63). In this case, in most cases, the recalculation of areas between the above-mentioned coordinate systems leads to a change in the area of land. Therefore, it is important to highlight some issues regarding the use of the USC-2000 coordinate system with the current land laws that may arise when used in conjunction with the SC-63, namely the possible excess of the rules for free remittance. land plots to citizens in the transition to a single state coordinate system. To investigate such distortions, the authors designed three model land plots in the coordinate system SC-63 in the maximum allowable area in accordance with the norms of free transfer for the maintenance of personal from the eagle economy (2,0000 ha) for the construction and maintenance of a residential building, commercial buildings and structures (private plot) in villages (0,2500 hectares) and for gardening respectively (0,1200 hectares).Subsequently, using the standard features of the licensed Digitals software , the coordinates of each plot of land from the SC-63 system in the USC-2000 were recalculated within the three selected administrative units. For the purpose of visual representation, the coordinates of the first point of the listed land plots in USC-2000 were given the coordinates of the first point of land in the system SC-63 .

No abstract

The authors developed twelve land management projects for the allocation of land plots to individuals and submitted them for approval to the territorial body of the central body of executive power, which implements state policy in the field of land relations.The peculiarity of the study is that the developed projects are identical in terms of location of land (adjacent land users), purpose, soil, composition of land and restrictions and burdens on their use. However, the responses of the territorial body of the central executive body implementing the state policy in the field of land relations to the consideration of each of these projects are different , despite the fact that the aforementioned land management projects were developed using the same methods, software and the same contractors.The lack of a unified system of standards for the development of land documentation and its constituent parts, as well as the criteria for reviewing and evaluating the compliance of such documentation with the territorial bodies of the central executive body implementing state policy in the field of land relations, is a key obstacle to a transparent land management process. This, in turn, creates the need to analyze the preconditions for standardization of documentation on land management and its components.