With the aim of providing reliable benchmark values, we have measured the Soret, thermodiffusion and molecular diffusion coefficients for the ternary mixture formed by 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, isobutylbenzene and n-dodecane for a mass fraction of 0.8-0.1-0.1 and at a temperature of 25°C. The experimental techniques used by the six participating laboratories are Optical Digital Interferometry, Taylor Dispersion technique, Open Ended Capillary, Optical Beam Deflection, Thermogravitational technique and Sliding Symmetric Tubes technique in ground conditions and Selectable Optical Diagnostic Instrument (SODI) in microgravity conditions. The measurements obtained in the SODI installation have been analyzed independently by four laboratories. Benchmark values are proposed for the thermodiffusion and Soret coefficients and for the eigenvalues of the diffusion matrix in ground conditions, and for Soret coefficients in microgravity conditions.

We report on the measurement of Soret (S) coefficients in the ternary system toluene (T)-methanol (M)-cyclohexane (Ch) onboard the International Space Station in the experiment selectable optical diagnostic instrument/DCMIX (Diffusion Coefficients Measurement in ternary mIXtures). Nine experiments were conducted in the range of mean temperatures between 298.15 K and 306.15 K in the mixture with composition 0.62 (T)-0.31 (M)-0.07 (Ch) in mass fractions. A linear dependence of the Soret coefficients on temperature was established for the ternary mixture. It has also been found that, over considered range of mean temperatures, the Soret coefficients of toluene are small and positive, while the Soret coefficients for methanol are negative and, at least, two times larger. The present work also presents a comprehensive study of possible methodologies to process raw data from the Soret experiment in ternary mixtures. All the experiments were processed by seven different schemes and two of them were identified as the most reliable. We also investigate the error propagation and explain the reasons for the discrepancy of the results obtained by different schemes.

No abstract

The paper is devoted to processing the data of DCMIX 1 space experiment. In this experiment, the Optical digital interferometry was used to measure the diffusion and Soret coefficients in the ternary mixture of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, isobutylbenzene and n-dodecane at mass fractions of 0.8/0.1/0.1 and at 25°C. The raw interferometric images were processed to obtain the temporal and spatial evolution of refractive indices for two laser beams of different wavelengths. The method for extracting the diffusion and thermal diffusion coefficients originally developed for optical beam deflection was extended to optical digital interferometry allowing for the spatial variation of refractive index along the diffusion path. The method was validated and applied to processing the data for Soret and diffusion steps in 5 experimental runs. The obtained results for the Soret coefficients and one of the eigenvalues of diffusion matrix showed acceptable agreement within each step. The second eigenvalue was not determined with sufficient accuracy.

Below are the queries associated with your article. Please answer all of these queries before sending the proof back to AIP. Article checklist: In order to ensure greater accuracy, please check the following and make all necessary corrections before returning your proof. 1. Is the title of your article accurate and spelled correctly? 2. Please check affiliations including spelling, completeness, and correct linking to authors. 3. Did you remember to include acknowledgment of funding, if required, and is it accurate? Location in article Query/Remark: click on the Q link to navigate to the appropriate spot in the proof. There, insert your comments as a PDF annotation. Q1 Please check that the author names are in the proper order and spelled correctly. Also, please ensure that each author's given and surnames have been correctly identified (given names are highlighted in red and surnames appear in blue). Q2 Q10 Please confirm the change in volume number in Ref. 2. Q11 References 3 and 18 contain identical information. Please check and provide the correct reference or delete the duplicate reference. If the duplicate is deleted, renumber the reference list as needed and update all citations in the text. Q12 We were unable to locate a digital object identifier (doi) for Ref. 17. Please verify and correct author names and journal details (journal title, volume number, page number, and year) as needed and provide the doi. If a doi is not available, no other information is needed from you. For additional information on doi's, please select this link: http//www.doi.org/.