No abstract

A scientific analysis of the mechanism of realization of social rights of Ukrainian citizens in the conditions of martial law was carried out: for social protection, for housing, for a sufficient standard of living. The place of social rights in the system of human rights, their legal regulation and mechanisms for ensuring them are determined. It was concluded that there are such types of social protection of the family, childhood, maternity and paternity as social assistance, social services and social benefits. In addition, the general principles and legal regulation of family and child protection in Ukraine are defined, the main directions of transformations aimed at ensuring rights in the social sphere are described. In particular, the state guarantees of compliance with the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of internally displaced persons displaced by war were analyzed. Finally, it was noted the presence of consolidated approaches to judicial practice in the field of family relations, in particular, in terms of the primacy of the principle of the best interests of the child.

The objective of the article was to analyze the tactical and procedural characteristics of conducting a record in the investigation of crimes against public security. To achieve the objective in the research process, a system of general and special methods is used, such as: dialectical method; method of systematic analysis of legal norms; comparative legal method; statistical method. Based on the study of legislation, scientific sources, the results of the generalization of investigative and judicial practice, current issues of normative content of the principle of immediacy of the study of evidence and the problems of its implementation during criminal procedural evidence. It is concluded that this principle determines the responsibilities of the persons conducting the trial (questioning suspects, accused, witnesses, victims, experts, hearing expert opinions, reviewing physical evidence, announcing and examining documents, audio and video recordings), to whom correspond the rights of other participants to present evidence, to become personally familiar with the materials of criminal proceedings, receive copies of procedural documents, participate directly in investigative and judicial actions. Finally, attention is paid to problematic issues related to the definition of the limits of the principle.