Problem setting. Since there are several types of mechanism depending on the direction of innovation activity, it is quite fair that today the category of “legal mechanism” and, in particular, “economic and legal mechanism”, “economic and organizational mechanism” is of interest not only. Target of research. The goal of the research is to outline the conceptual mechanism of technology transfer, where one of the most important factors that have the greatest impact on the functionality, that is the crushing force is the potential of development as an object of commercialization and implementation of ready-to-use technology on the professional market. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Eglė Štareikė analyzed the organizational mechanism through an approach to the system of complex control of an open system of socio-economic integration. Boichuk R. P. uses legal mechanisms to ensure the proper implementation of subjective rights and legitimate interests of economic subjects defined by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. Tereshkina N. E. insists on the existence of normative-legal and regulatory mechanisms in the innovation sphere. Article’s main body. The author points out that the structure of the technology transfer mechanism includes the following elements: the object; the center; the subjects; a set of methods and techniques as tools of analytical, research nature and tools for implementing intentions and plans; the conditions that determine the limitations and requirements for obtaining the target result; the stages An exclusive feature of the organizational and economic mechanism are the subjects and their actions. Entities that create and / or use technologies and / or their components and which own or transfer property rights to use intellectual property rights that are part of technology and individuals who are directly involved in the creation, transfer and use technologies and / or their components, provide the necessary information, financial and other services at all stages of promotion of technologies and / or their components on the market perform certain actions that lead to a certain result at each stage of technology transfer. It was revealed that the stages of technology transfer mechanism consist of stages, which are implemented through processes and end with the compilation of specific documentation. Singling out the individual stages and determining the content of the stages, the processes of each stage is essential for understanding the innovation process. In particular, the following stages: the choice and preliminary assessment of technology; establishment of an assessment of the chosen technology involves the following processes; conducting research to identify a calculation of the assessment of the potential of the development as an object of commercialization and promotion of ready-to-use technology in the core market; cooperation with consumers of technology. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The economic-legal mechanism of technology transfer is considered as a complex inter-branch legal institute that combines the norms of law of different branches (financial, tax, civil, economic law, etc.) and is aimed at systemic legal regulation of social relations in the field of technology transfer on the basis of coordination of legal and economic interests of society. The peculiarity of the structure of this mechanism is that its composition combines both economic regulators and legal factors, the aggregate of which is reduced to the interaction of organizational-economic and legal components. The efficiency of the economic-legal mechanism of technology transfer depends not only on the legal regulation, but also on the coordinated and clear interaction of all its elements and, above all, the actions of the subjects of technology transfer.

Problem setting. The issues of international technology transfer are reflected in the scientific works of both foreign and Ukrainian scientists. The concept of «international technology transfer» is widely used in the legal and economic literature, but there are significant differences of opinion among scholars regarding its essence. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Among Ukrainian scientists, international technology transfer is considered more in the economic literature: H. O. Bak, O. B. Salikhova, A. S. Bura, O. O. Bakalinska, Y. Yakubivska. Various foreign scientists have considered international technology transfer in their works. In particular, R. D. Robinson and and G. F. Jewett, Kasych A. and Medvedeva G., C. Liu and S. Yan, Sepúlveda C. I. and Ocampos J. A., Lundquist D. G. and Grosse R. Target of the research is to identify the views on the category of «international technology transfer» existing in the scientific literature and to study them in order to specify the nature of international technology transfer. Article’s main body. The article is devoted to the issue of identifying the concept of international technology transfer in the scientific discourse. The article studies the conceptual provisions for substantiating the essence of the category of «international technology transfer» and conducts a bibliographic analysis of the studies of this category. The author emphasizes that the issues of international technology transfer are reflected in the scientific works of both foreign and Ukrainian scholars. The concept of «international technology transfer» is widespread in the legal and economic literature, but there are significant differences of opinion among scholars regarding its essence. This study has led to the conclusion that the variety of definitions of the concept of «international technology transfer» demonstrates the existence of diverse approaches to understanding the essence of the problem of international transfer of technology. It is determined that all approaches are reasonable and relevant and their use depends on the specific aspect under which international technology transfer is considered. The study found that in order to improve the category of «international technology transfer», its concept should be fixed in the Ukrainian Law «On State Regulation of Activities in the Field of Technology Transfer» by amending Article 1 of this Law. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The study has led to the conclusion that international technology transfer as a category is a basic, complex and complex definition that characterizes legal relations arising between a business entity or other party to the relationship and a foreign entity, which is a resident and non-resident of the country, respectively, and related to the creation, transfer of rights and implementation of technology, as well as the conclusion of certain agreements aimed at transferring rights to technology or information about technology, or material embodiment (reproduction) of technology in the field of technology transfer

Problem setting. There are many theoretical and applied developments in the world on the optimal mechanisms for technology transfer and commercialization of innovations. All of them are relevant and deserve attention in a particular case. All of them include such elements as the developer and customer of the technology, the innovative product, the system of relations between the parties to the technological agreement, government regulation. Accordingly, choosing the method of commercialization or form of technology transfer has various economic and legal consequences. Target of research. The purpose of this article is to study the analysis of systematization of types and organizational forms of technology transfer technology transfer. Аnalysis of recent researches and publications. The issues of classification of types, forms of technology transfer and features of technology transfer agreements have been revealed in the research of many scientists. V. N. Shcheblikin and A. C. Ershov argued that the forms of technology transfer should include, in particular, vertical and horizontal. But most scientists consider them as types of technology transfer, such as O. O. Plakhotnik and V. Ya. Shoemaker. The latter in his article identified that the forms and types of technology transfer should be separated by providing a meaningful classification of species. He noted only the main points regarding the forms of technology transfer. Problematic issues of contractual aspects of technology transfer were revealed in the study of B. M. Paduchak on the classification of agreements in the field of technology transfer and significant issues of these agreements, V. M. Kryzhna, who drew attention to the terms of the agreement on the transfer of know-how, Yu. S. Panina, separated the franchise agreement from the agreement on the transfer of know-how. V. D. Mekheda noted the peculiarities of the engineering contract and Y. M. Kapitsa, who noted that an engineering contract can be concluded in the field of technology transfer. Article’s main body. Technology transfer can be considered in two main forms: as a process of technology transfer without concluding an agreement between the subjects of the innovation process (information transfer); as a process of technology transfer from one entity to another under the terms of a contract concluded between them at the legal level. If we interpret the term “form”, it is a type, structure, way of organizing something; the external manifestation of a phenomenon associated with its essence, content. Hence, the form of technology transfer should be interpreted, in particular, as a way of organization. Thus, vertical and horizontal; corporate, regional, national and transnational (international) technology transfer; commercial and non-commercial technology transfer are types of technology transfer. In our opinion, organizational or commercial forms of international and domestic transfer should be defined as: purchase and sale of licenses in circulation in the technology market (economic and legal basis of this is a patent as a security document, license agreement (or license); transfer of scientific development on the basis of franchising, transfer of scientific development on the basis of know-how agreement, transfer of scientific development on the basis of leasing, transfer of scientific development on the basis of engineering, transfer of property rights to technologies and their components in exchange of scientific and technical results. Conclusions and prospects for the development. In essence, according to certain categories, the following typesof technology transfer are distinguished, such as: depending on the type of technology transfer, there are vertical andhorizontal technology transfer; depending on the types of innovation policy there are: corporate, regional, national andtransnational (international) technology transfer; by means of technology transfer or by commercial nature or economiccontent, technology transfer is divided into commercial and non-commercial. Based on the fact that the organizational forms of technology transfer systematized by groups, we conclude that thefirst group of forms should include those based on agreements related to the process of technology transfer, ie the implementationof property rights to technology: purchase and sale of licenses in circulation in the technology market (licenseagreement (or license); transfer of scientific developments on the basis of franchising (franchising agreement); transferof scientific developments on the basis of know-how agreement (know-how agreement). The second group should include those forms that are based on contracts, the main purpose of which is not related tothe implementation of property rights to technology, namely: the transfer of scientific developments on the basis of leasing(leasing agreement); transfer of scientific developments on the basis of engineering (engineering contract); transferof property rights to technologies and their components in the exchange of scientific and technical results on the basis ofthe activities of joint ventures (agreement on joint activities) (simple partnership agreement).

The article reflects the essence of innovative services and service innovations and features of their implementation in healthcare organizations. The possibilities of their implementation in practice of advanced materials, digital technologies in health care: cloud computing, Internet of things, blockchain, artificial intelligence, machine learning, etc. are outlined. The works of scientists on the use of medical innovations in the practice of health care organizations were analyzed. It is proposed to consider service innovations in health care as innovations that are characterized by focus on health care, have a high level of novelty as a product (services) and have no common characteristics with a previously produced product, based on technology or information technology in the field of health care. The author determines that since an innovative service is a service, medical innovation services is a contractually defined action or a set of actions of doctor (medical institution) — service providers, which are associated with the provision of service, which can be the result of such service, has a cost evaluation and is aimed at generating profit over a long period of time. But the process of medical innovation refers to a new method of production and provision of medical services, and the production of a medical service is related to its result. A new service product in health care should be thought of as a health care function sold as a commodity or a new service in which the characteristics have been changed to include an entirely new set of health care characteristics. A health care organization is essentially a service organization that can use the latest technology in its operations to improve the quality of care. If the emphasis is on competition among health care organizations, then such organizations are better off using a “blue ocean” strategy, which is characterized not by “bloody” competition but by the application of untapped market potential, symbolized by deep blue water. Competition among health care organizations provides powerful incentives that encourage health care providers to develop innovative solutions but raises concerns about providing substandard health care services and creating duplication of health care services. Therefore, the provision of medical innovation services in health care should emphasize the value of patient life and health, quality, convenience and accessibility of such service.

No abstract