As it is known, drought is one of the most important issues of recent years. On the other hand, agriculture is the sector that uses the most water. The impact of drought can be reduced by reducing the water used in agriculture. Therefore, it is very important to determine the application time and amount of irrigation water for a successful agricultural irrigation management. One of the most important ways to achieve this success is to accurately determine and monitor the water content in the plant root zone. Soil water content can be determined in two ways; direct and indirect methods. The direct measurement method is tedious, laborious and time consuming. Instead, a large number of indirect measurement methods are developed. One of these indirect measurement methods is the PR2 Profile Probe method. In this study, the possibilities of using PR2 method under different soil water content conditions were investigated. First, the calibration of the PR2 method was made within 40 cm of soil depth. Then, the water content in the soil was monitored by the PR2 method under three different soil water content (100%, 75% and 50%) conditions. R2 values for calibration relationships varied between 0.7947 and 0.9305. In the study, it was concluded that soil water content could be monitored with PR2 Profile Probe.

In this study, the yield and possible salt accumulation around the root area of eggplant was investigated. Seven irrigation treatments were tested including a controlling irrigation (FULL). Two of these irrigation treatments had 25% and 50% less water accordingly than the treatment of FULL and water was conventionally applied to both sides of the plant roots (CDI25 and CDI50). The other two deficit irrigation treatments had 25% and 50% less water accordingly than the treatment of FULL and water was applied only one side of the roots and the other halves were left relatively dry in each irrigation. This case was replaced alternatively for every irrigation (APRD25 and APRD50). The last two deficit irrigation treatments had also 25% and 50% less water accordingly than the treatment of FULL, however throughout the season water was applied only one side of the roots and the other halves were left relatively dry in each irrigation in fixed irrigations (FPRD25 and FPRD50). The differences between the yields of the eggplant under different irrigation treatments were statically important (p < 0.01). The range of yields depending on irrigation treatments were between 23.37 t ha -1 and 83.10 t ha -1. The highest salt accumulation was recorded in treatment FPRD25 for the root area and treatment CDI50 for along the rows of plants. When compared with the values of the beginning of the season; the salinity was multiplied by 3.2 for the root area of treatment FPRD25 at the end of the season. In a similar way, the salinity was multiplied by 7.1 at the end of the season for treatment CDI50 along the rows of plants when compared with the beginning of the season.

This article was checked by intihal.net. KEVÂŞÎ'NİN TEFSİRİNDE KIRAAT VECİHLERİNİN ANLAMA ETKİLERİ (ENBİYA SURESİ ÖRNEĞİ) Ömer ÖZBEK * ÖZ XII. yüz yılın sonu ile XIII. yüz yılın başlarında yaşamış olan Muvaffaküddîn el-Mavsîlî Ahmed b. Yusuf b. Hasen b. Rafi b. Huseyn b. Suveydan el-Kevâşî (ö. 680/1281) Musul yakınlarındaki Kevâşe'de doğmuş ve bu çevrede yetişmiş, 680/1281 yılında yine burada vefat etmiştir. Şafiî mezhebine bağlı olduğu bilinmektedir. Kaleme almış olduğu Tabsıratü'l-Mütezekkir fi't-Tefsîr isimli eserini, daha sonra özetleyerek et-Telhîs ismi ile küçük hacimli bir tefsir oluşturmuştur. Müfessir olarak çok meşhur olmasa da eserlerine bakılarak Kevâşî'nin en fazla tefsir, kıraat ve Arap dili gibi ilimlerle meşgul olduğu söylenebilir. Bu alanlarda kendisini kabul ettirmiş ve otorite sayılmıştır. Onun tefsirinden Celâleddin el-Mahallî (ö. 864/1460) ile birlikte Suyûtî (ö. 911/1505) de istifade etmiştir.

No abstract

Layout:Tjaša Vukmanič and Urška Lisec