The purpose of this study is to describe the empirical phenomenon of the research consortium of the National Research Program on Electric Vehicle Technology at the Research Organization of Engineering Sciences (OR-IPT), the National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) within the framework of governance theory. This study used descriptive qualitative method. Data collection techniques were carried out by interview and study policy documents. Sources of data include the Program Coordinator, document monitoring and evaluation reports on program implementation, minutes of technical meetings, and results of previous research. This study found that collaborative collaboration on the research consortium of the National Research Program on Electric Vehicle Technology at the Research Organization of Engineering Sciences (OR-IPT), the National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) can reduce research costs effectively and efficiently, as well as supporting the availability of human resources, expertise and infrastructure.

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui proses pelaksanaan kebijakan refocusing kegiatan, manfaat dari pelaksanaan kebijakan tersebut sudah tepat sasaran, kendala atau permasalahan yang dihadapi, dan tindak lanjut yang dilakukan. Metode penelitian dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Implementasi kebijakan refocusing kegiatan  penanggulangan penanganan Covid-19 dilaksanakan secara patuh dan konsisten, dengan menghasilkan temuan atau inovasi. Pemerintah perlu membuat kebijakan atau program yang dilakukan secara kolaboratif, terutama dalam menghasilkan inovasi

No abstract

The purpose of this research is to explore the process of national economic recovery policy formulation, how it was regulated, and searching the alternatives to overcome economic problems along with its benefit and value for businesses and the general public amidst the covid19 pandemic. The qualitative descriptive method is utilized based on the systematic literature review of secondary data. Policy alternatives are determined by comparing policies in two countries, Indonesia and the United States of America. By observing the impact and cause beyond the scope, policy alternatives could be more easily identified, selected, and implemented according to their political feasibility. In accordance with identifying policy alternatives model which divide into two categories, Indonesia’s government employed temporary research analysis while United States federal governments were applying status quo analysis.