Many discrepancy in selection of proper filter and its parameters for individual cases exists. The authors investigate the impact of the most common filters on patient NM images with coronary artery disease (CAD), and compare the results with the computerized tomography (CT)-Angio and angiography for accuracy.The investigation initiated by performing various single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT)/CT scan of the national electrical manufacturers association chest phantoms having hot and cold inserts. Data acquired on GE 670 PRO SPECT/CT; 360Ø, 64 frames, 60 seconds, low energy high resolution (LEHR) 128, low energy general purpose (LEGP) with CT attenuation (120 kV and 170 mA). The images reconstructed with filtered back projection and ITERATIVE ordered-subset expectation maximization utilizing filters; Hann, Butterworth, Metz, Hamming, and Wiener. The Image contrast was calculated to assess absolute nearness of the inserts. Based on the preliminary results, then scans of 92 patients with CAD; 64 males and 28 females, age 41 to 77 years old, who had been reported earlier reprocessed with the nominated filter and were reported by 2 NM expert. The results compared to the earlier reports and to the CT–Angio and angiography.The optimization suggested 3 filters; Wiener (Wi), Metz and Butterworth (But) provide the highest contrast (99– 66.4%) and (81– 32%) for the cold and hot inserts respectively, with the (Wi) filter to be the better option. The reprocessed patients scan with the (Wi) presented an elevated diagnostic accuracy, correlated well with the CT-Angio and angiography results (P < .001 and r = 0.79 for [Wi] and P = .004 and r = 0.39 for [But]). The percentage of the false negative for moderate to severe CAD cases reported using Wi filter reduced from 27% to 7% and similarly for mild CAD cases from 7% to 1%.It appears the Wiener filter could produce results with the highest contrast for phantom imaging of various cold and hot spheres and for the patient data which is more consistent with angiography results, with much-elevated accuracy in intermediate cases (r = 0.79 for Wiener and r = 0.39 for Butterworth vs angiography). However, the optimum parameters obtained for the filters have no relation with the resolution of the imaging system, but the details of the objects could be improved.

No abstract