Retropharyngeal hematoma occurs rarely. It is located just in front of the cervical spine. Many circumstances can lead to its development. A trauma and/or anticoagulants are often key factors. The assessment must be made extremely carefully as such a hematoma can induce an airway compromise. Trauma being a key factor, it can also present with cervical spine fractures, increasing the risks. Two different cases of retropharyngeal hematomas are reported. The first case required surgical management with tracheotomy, per-oral drainage and naso-gastric tube feeding. A total recovery was obtained in 2 weeks. The second patient underwent medical treatment (methylprednisolone), and recovery was obtained in 6 days. Surgery for retropharyngeal hematoma is not always mandatory. It becomes necessary when a major dysphagia or dyspnea occurs. In other cases, medical treatment and close observation are usually sufficient.
Local relapses of head and neck tumors are not often eligible for surgical and/or radiotherapy retreatment, and the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy is poor. A greater accumulation and efficacy of anticancer drugs with lower systemic toxicity is theoretically obtained with intratumoral chemotherapy. In experimental studies, epinephrine has been shown to increase the concentration and antitumor effect of intratumoral cisplatin. Fourteen patients with locally recurrent head and neck tumors (median age, 58.7 years) were included in this phase 2 trial. Recurrent tumors (squamous cell carcinomas) were located on the tongue, oral pharynx, or cervical nodes. Prior therapy was surgery and/or radiotherapy with or without intravenous chemotherapy. Inclusion criteria included an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization performance status of 0, 1, or 2, an anticipated survival of >3 months, adequate cardiac, kidney, liver, and bone marrow function, and no coagulopathy or carotid invasion. Fifty intratumoral injections of cisplatin-epinephrine (average, 3.6 injections per patient; range, 1 to 5 injections) were given to the 14 patients from November 1998 to July 2000. Patients were treated with cisplatin (1 mg/mL; maximum dose, 50 mg) at an injection volume corresponding to the tumor volume (1 mL/cm3 of tumor; maximum volume, 50 mL). Epinephrine was added at a concentration of 0.02 mg/mL. Intratumoral injections were repeated every 2 to 3 weeks at different locations in the tumors to obtain a homogeneous distribution. Tumor response was evaluated by clinical examination and computed tomography. Eight objective responses were registered among the 14 patients. Four were complete responses, and 4 were partial responses. The average time to disease progression was 11.5 +/- 8.9 weeks. Local adverse effects were transient pain, swelling, and erythema at the site of the injection. No nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, or ototoxicity was observed. Intratumoral injection of cisplatin and epinephrine in an aqueous solution has a definite antitumor activity in recurrent head and neck cancer with acceptable local tolerance and no major systemic toxic effects except for transient tachycardia and high blood pressure at the time of injection.
In this prospective study the outcome of the Digisonic® SP Binaural cochlear implant (CI), a device enabling electric stimulation of both cochleae by a single receiver, was evaluated in 14 postlingually deafened adults after 12 months of use. Speech perception was tested using French disyllabic words in quiet and in speech-shaped noise at +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Horizontal sound localization in quiet was tested using pink noise coming from 5 loudspeakers, from –90 to +90° along the azimuth. Speech scores in quiet were 76% (±19.5 SD) in the bilateral condition, 62% (±24 SD) for the better ear alone and 43.5% (±27 SD) for the poorer ear alone. Speech scores in noise were 60% (±27.5 SD), 46% (±28 SD) and 28% (±25 SD), respectively, in the same conditions. Statistical analysis showed a significant advantage of the bilateral use in quiet and in noise (p < 0.05 compared to the better ear). Significant spatial perception benefits such as summation effect (p < 0.05), head shadow effect (p < 0.0001) and squelch effect (p < 0.0005) were noted. Sound localization accuracy improved significantly when using the device in the bilateral condition with an average root mean square of 35°. Compared with published outcomes of usual bilateral cochlear implantation, this device could be a valuable alternative to two CIs. Prospective controlled trials, comparing the Digisonic SP Binaural CI with a standard bilateral cochlear implantation are mandatory to evaluate their respective advantages and cost-effectiveness.
Technological advances in the domain of digital signal processing adapted to cochlear implants (CI) are partially responsible for the ever-improving outcomes observed with this neural prosthesis. The goal of the present study was to evaluate audiometric outcomes with a new signal processing strategy implemented in Oticon Medical-Neurelec cochlear implant systems, the xDP strategy. The core of this approach is a preset-based back-end output compression system, modulating a multi-channel transfer function depending on the intensity and information content of input sounds. Twenty adult CI patients, matched for age and CI experience, were included in this study. Pure-tone thresholds and vocal audiometry scores were measured with their former signal processing strategy and with xDP. Speech perception was assessed using dissyllabic words presented in quiet, at different intensity levels: 40, 55, 70, and 85 dB SPL, and in a cocktail party noise at a signal-to-noise ratio of +10 dB. Results with the xDP strategy showed, as awaited, no major modification of pure-tone thresholds. A global increase of speech perception scores was observed after a 1-month habituation period, with significant improvements for speech perception in quiet for moderate (55 dB SPL), loud speech sounds (85 dB SPL), and speech-in-noise comprehension. Subjective signal quality assessment showed a preference for Crystalis(xDP) over the former strategy. These results allow the quantification of improvements provided by the xDP signal processing strategy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.