Agents embedded in open, dynamic and decentralized environments adopt different ontologies to describe their domain of discourse. Yet, agents have no prior knowledge of the other agents with whom they will interact. Therefore, a consistent and compatible communication relies on the agents' ability to reconcile in run-time the vocabulary used in their ontologies whose result is a set of correspondences. Since each party might have its own perspective about what are the best correspondences, conflicts arise. To address such conflicts, it is envisaged as a suitable approach that agents adopt the generic argument-based negotiation process presented in [1]. A critical issue of that process concerns the argument generation process according to the argumentation framework that it relies on. In this paper we propose an automatic process to generate arguments regarding the ontologies reconciliation through semantic interpretations of third party generated correspondences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.