This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH). Abbreviations ! APC argon plasma coagulation ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists DAPT dual antiplatelet therapy CHADS 2 congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack [risk score] CI confidence interval DOAC direct oral anticoagulant ESGE

The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease is increasing worldwide and the underlying molecular mechanisms are far from being fully elucidated. Herein, we evaluated the role of N-glycosylation dysregulation in T cells as a key mechanism in the ulcerative colitis (UC) pathogenesis. The evaluation of the branched N-glycosylation levels and profile of intestinal T cell receptor (TCR) were assessed in colonic biopsies from UC patients and healthy controls. Expression alterations of the glycosyltransferase gene MGAT5 were also evaluated. We demonstrated that UC patients exhibit a dysregulation of TCR branched N-glycosylation on lamina propria T lymphocytes. Patients with severe UC showed the most pronounced defect on N-glycan branching in T cells. Moreover, UC patients showed a significant reduction of MGAT5 gene transcription in T lymphocytes. In this study, we disclose for the first time that a deficiency in branched N-glycosylation on TCR due to a reduced MGAT5 gene expression is a new molecular mechanism underlying UC pathogenesis, being a potential novel biomarker with promising clinical and therapeutic applications.

BACKGROUND: Rubber band ligation and sclerotherapy are considered the office-based procedures of choice in hemorrhoidal disease. However, there are no studies comparing rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy. OBJECTIVE:We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy compared with rubber band ligation. DESIGN:This study was a randomized open-label study with 1-year follow-up. SETTINGS:The study was conducted in the colorectal unit of a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS:One hundred twenty patients with hemorrhoidal disease grades I to III were included. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were stratified by hemorrhoidal disease grade and randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with either rubber band ligation (n = 60) or polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (n = 60). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Efficacy outcomes included therapeutic success and recurrence. Safety outcomes included the occurrence of complications related to the procedures. RESULTS: Therapeutic success was not significantly different between the groups (polidocanol foam sclerotherapy 93.3% vs rubber band ligation 85.0%, p = 0.14). However, complete success rate was higher in the polidocanol foam sclerotherapy group (88.3% vs 66.7%, p = 0.009) with fewer office-based sessions (mean ± SD: 1.32 ± 0.60 vs 1.62 ± 0.76, p = 0.02). Recurrence rates were lower in the polidocanol foam sclerotherapy group (16.1% vs 41.2%, p = 0.004). Most recurrences were mild (83.3%). Complications were more frequent in the rubber band ligation group (30.0% vs 10.0%, p = 0.01) and were mostly minor (91.7%). No severe complications were observed in either group. LIMITATIONS: This study was performed in a single center, and both patients and investigators were not blinded to the treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures are effective in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease grades I to III. Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy was more effective than rubber band ligation when considering complete success. Patients in the polidocanol foam sclerotherapy group needed fewer treatment sessions, had lower recurrence rates, and were less likely to have complications. See

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a frequent health problem with considerable repercussions on patients’ quality of life. However, much of the clinical practice related to HD is based on knowledge without scientific evidence and supported largely by empirical experience of the physician who deals with this pathology. As in other countries, the goal of this consensus is to establish statements supported by solid scientific evidence and whose purpose will be to standardize and guide the diagnosis and management of HD both in the general population and in some particular groups of patients.