In order to achieve lower fuel consumption and less greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, we need higher efficiency vehicles with improved performance. Electrification is the most promising solution to enable a more sustainable and environmentally friendly transportation system. Electrified transportation vision includes utilizing more electrical energy to power traction and nontraction loads in the vehicle. In electrified powertrain applications, the efficiency of the electrical path, and the power and energy density of the components play important roles to improve the electric range of the vehicle to run the engine close to its peak efficiency point and to maintain lower energy consumption with less emissions. In general, the electrified powertrain architecture, design and control of the powertrain components, and software development are coupled to facilitate an efficient, high-performance, and reliable powertrain. In this paper, enabling technologies and solutions for the electrified transportation are discussed in terms of power electronics, electric machines, electrified powertrain architectures, energy storage systems (ESSs), and controls and software.

The growing interest and recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) have actively contributed to an increase in research and development of new methods to estimate the states of electrified vehicle batteries. Data-driven approaches, such as ML, are becoming more popular for estimating the state of charge (SOC) and state of health (SOH) due to greater availability of battery data and improved computing power capabilities. This paper provides a survey of battery state estimation methods based on ML approaches such as feedforward neural networks (FNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), support vector machines (SVM), radial basis functions (RBF), and Hamming networks. Comparisons between methods are shown in terms of data quality, inputs and outputs, test conditions, battery types, and stated accuracy to give readers a bigger picture view of the ML landscape for SOC and SOH estimation. Additionally, to provide insight into how to best approach with the comparison of different neural network structures, an FNN and long short-term memory (LSTM) RNN are trained fifty times each for 3000 epochs. The error is somewhat different for each training repetition due to the random initial values of the trainable parameters, demonstrating that it is important to train networks multiple times to achieve the best result. Furthermore, it is recommended that when performing a comparison among estimation techniques such as those presented in this review paper, the compared networks should have a similar number of learnable parameters and be trained and tested with identical data. Otherwise, it is difficult to make a general conclusion regarding the quality of a given estimation technique. INDEX TERMS Machine learning, artificial intelligence, deep learning, battery management systems (BMS), electric vehicles, state of charge, state of health.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract