We examined the sensitivity and specificity of 11 PCR assays described for the species identification of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli by using 111 type, reference, and field strains of C. jejuni, C. coli, and Campylobacter lari. For six assays, an additional 21 type strains representing related Campylobacter, Arcobacter, and Helicobacter species were also included. PCR tests were initially established in the laboratory by optimizing conditions with respect to five type and reference strains of C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari. One PCR test for C. coli failed to give appropriate results during this initial setup phase and was not evaluated further. The remaining 10 assays were used to examine heated lysate and purified DNA templates as appropriate of well-characterized type, reference, and field strains of C. jejuni (n ؍ 62), C. coli (n ؍ 34), and C. lari (n ؍ 15). The tests varied considerably in their sensitivity and specificity for their respective target species. No assay was found to be 100% sensitive and/or specific for all C. jejuni strains tested, but four assays for C. coli gave appropriate responses for all strains examined. Between one and six strains of C. jejuni gave amplicons in four of seven C. jejuni PCR tests only where purified DNA was used as the template; corresponding results were seen with one strain of C. coli in each of three assays for the latter species. Our findings indicate that a polyphasic strategy for PCR-based identification should be used to identify C. jejuni and C. coli strains. The data may assist laboratories in selecting assays suited for their needs and in designing evaluations of future PCR tests aimed to identify these species.
Campylobacter jejuni is a major cause of human diarrhoeal disease, but specific virulence mechanisms have not been well defined. This blinded study was undertaken with 40 C. jejuni isolates from different sources to determine their haemolytic, cytotoxic and adhesion and invasion activities towards mammalian cells. The results were correlated with source of isolation and genetic makeup by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) typing. The isolates had variable degrees of haemolytic activity against rabbit erythrocytes and cytotoxicity towards CaCo-2, HeLa and Vero cells. The data indicated that the haemolytic and cytotoxic activities were due to separate factors. A range of cytotoxicity was exhibited, whereby some strains had no activity against the target cells and others had activity against all three cell lines. Certain strains had activity against CaCo-2 cells but little or no activity against the other cells, while others exhibited the opposite phenotype. The data suggested that the cytotoxicity assay with the different cell lines may have detected more than one cytotoxin. A wide variation between isolates was observed for both adherence and invasion with all three cell lines, yet, overall, the strains showed a significantly greater invasion capacity for CaCo-2. There was no clear relationship between source of isolation or disease manifestation and possession of statistically significantly higher levels of particular virulence-associated factors although, in some cases, a correlation between cytotoxicity and cell invasion was evident. Five AFLP clusters, each representing two to eleven isolates with similar profiles, were observed at the 90 % similarity level. Some AFLP groups contained isolates with a common serotype, but each group had C. jejuni isolates from more than one source with the exception of group IV, which contained only human isolates. Isolates with high cytotoxic activity against CaCo-2 cells were confined to groups I, III and IV and a group of unrelated strains (U). Group II isolates had uniformly low cytotoxicity. Isolates in groups I, V and U were more invasive for CaCo-2 cells than isolates in groups II, III and IV. The strain differences in cytotoxicity or invasion did not correlate with source of isolation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.