Word prediction is often recommended by therapists as a means to improve typing speed for clients with physical limitations. Although literature suggests that word prediction does have an effect on writing proficiency, increased speed is not one of its benefits when used with a standard keyboard. One reason given for the failure of word prediction to accelerate typing is that the user must look away from any source document to scan the prediction list during typing. Looking away from the source document may slow the typist more than any acceleration offered by word prediction. For input methods that already require the typist to look away from the copy, this effect might be irrelevant. The focus of this research was to determine whether word completion or word prediction programs would increase typing speed when used with an input method (an on-screen keyboard) that also requires looking away from the source document. Ten people, five men and five women, aged 20 to 38 years, participated in this study. The study used a single-subject, successive intervention design to test typing speed and accuracy using an on-screen keyboard with integrated word prediction software. Seven participants had their fastest typing speed with word prediction. Two participants had their fastest typing speed with word completion. Only one participant demonstrated no improvement in speed when using these two programs. Overall, these results show that the use of word prediction and word completion may assist on-screen keyboard users to improve typing speed.