BACKGROUND Approximately 30% of breast carcinoma patients with negative lymph nodes die of their disease. Biologic markers such p53 protein and c‐erb B‐2 have been related to tumor progression, but their prognostic value remains controversial. METHODS Two large series of a total of 613 lymph node negative breast carcinoma patients from a single institution were analyzed with respect to tumor size, histologic grade, and immunohistochemical staining for p53, c‐erb B‐2, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PgR). Interobserver variation in histologic grading was evaluated by Kappa statistics. The two series had different treatment modalities: 228 patients (SACGS group) were treated surgically with mastectomy and given 1 perioperative chemotherapy course, and 385 patients (HOST group) were treated with mastectomy and ovarian radiation and further randomized to receive postoperative treatment with radiotherapy or no adjuvant treatment. The follow‐up ranged from 14–30 years. RESULTS Immunoreactivities for p53, c‐erb B‐2, ER, and PgR did not differ significantly in the two series. p53 immunostaining was present in 187 of 613 tumors (29%), and c‐erb B‐2 immunoreactivity was present in 58 of the tumors (10%). Three hundred forty‐eight tumors (57%) were positive for ER. Kappa statistics value of interobserver variation in the histologic grading of ductal carcinomas was 0.69, which is considered to be a substantial degree of agreement. No significant differences in survival were found when comparing p53, c‐erb B‐2, ER, and PgR positive and negative cases. However, both recurrence free survival rates and overall survival rates after 10 years were significantly better in the T1N0M0 group compared with the T2N0M0 group (81% vs. 67% [P < 0.0001] and 85% vs. 70% [P < 0.0001]). Ten‐year recurrence free survival rates for patients with histologic Grade 1 versus Grades 2–3 (according to Elston and Ellis' modification of the Bloom and Richardson method) tumors were 90% and 70%, respectively (P < 0.0001), and overall survival rates for the same groups were 94% and 81%, respectively (P=0.0002). After 30 years of follow‐up, the overall survival rate for patients with tumors of histologic Grade 1 versus Grades 2–3 were 87% and 68%, respectively, and were 78% and 66%, respectively, for patients with tumors ≤ 2 mm versus those with tumors > 20–50 mm. Approximately 35% of the patients with tumors of histologic Grades 2–3 and measuring > 20 mm were dead after 10 years of follow‐up, contrary to 6% of the patients with tumors of histologic Grade 1 measuring ≤ 20 mm. A significantly more favorable prognosis also was observed in patients in the HOST group treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Histologic grade and tumor size were found to be major prognostic factors for patients after 30 years of follow‐up. c‐erb B‐2 and p53 immunostaining does not appear have any independent prognostic value. Adjuvant radiotherapy may be of value in the treatment of patients with localized tumors. Cancer 2000;88:804–13. © 2000 Am...
From 1971 to 1985 a total of 122 patients with non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital with radiation doses that increased from 50 Gy (at 2 Gy/fractions) to 70 Gy (at 2 Gy/fractions) during the treatment period. Possible relationship between the increase in dose and survival time was investigated. The median cancer-specific survival time was 50 months, and the median crude survival time 38 months. No correlation was found between radiation dose and survival time. In a multivariate analysis histology was found to be the most important prognostic factor for survival with a relative risk of death from cancer of 3.4 and 3.2 for non-keratinizing carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma respectively compared with undifferentiated carcinoma. When assessed in terms of N category the relative death risk for N2/N3 was 2.1 compared to N0/N1.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.