We investigated the potential role of the alpha1-containing GABA(A) receptor in regulating the reinforcing properties of alcohol. To accomplish this, we developed 3-propoxy-beta-carboline hydrochloride (3-PBC), a mixed agonist-antagonist benzodiazepine site ligand with binding selectivity at the alpha1 receptor. We then tested the capacity of 3-PBC to block alcohol-maintained responding in the ventral pallidum (VP), a novel alcohol reward substrate, which primarily expresses the alpha1-receptor isoform. Our results demonstrated that bilateral microinfusion of 3-PBC (0.5-40 microg) in the anterior and medial VP produced marked reductions in alcohol-maintained responding in a genetically selected rodent model of alcohol drinking. The VP infusions showed both neuroanatomical and reinforcer specificity because no effects were seen in sites dorsal to the VP (e.g., nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen). The saccharin-maintained responding was reduced only with the highest dose (40 microg). Parenteral injections of 3-PBC (1-20 mg/kg) also showed a similar selectivity on alcohol-maintained responding. Complementary in vitro studies revealed that 3-PBC exhibited a low partial agonist efficacy profile at recombinant diazepam-sensitive receptors (e.g., alpha1beta3gamma2, alpha2beta3gamma, and alpha3beta3gamma2). The selective suppression of 3-PBC on alcohol-maintained responding after central and parenteral administrations, together with its low-efficacy agonist profile, suggest that the reduction in alcohol-maintained behaviors was not attributable to a general suppression on consummatory behaviors. These results demonstrate that the alpha1-containing GABA(A) receptors in both the anterior and medial VP are important in regulating the reinforcing properties of alcohol. These receptors represent novel targets in the design and development of pharmacotherapies for alcohol-dependent subjects.

The results demonstrate that responding for BSR is not associated with EtOH preference, insofar as alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats respond similarly under an array of reinforcement schedules and current intensities. In contrast, genetic selection for EtOH preference is highly associated with responding for a palatable sucrose reward, and the relation increases as the reward cost for the sucrose increases. These findings suggest that similar/overlapping mechanisms of action regulate the reinforcing properties of EtOH and sucrose but that overlapping yet distinct neuronal mechanism may modulate the reward characteristics of BSR and EtOH preference.

Differences in the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) pathway that regulates alcohol preference may also increase sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of other drugs of abuse. In the present study, the curve-shift (rate-frequency) paradigm was used to quantify the interaction of amphetamine with the rewarding effects of lateral hypothalamic brain stimulation reward (BSR) in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) rats. The role of D-sub-1 and D-sub-2 DA receptors of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) in mediating the reward-potentiating effects of amphetamine was also determined. Animals were tested with randomly administered amphetamine (0.25, 0.75, 1.25 mg/kg ip), DA-receptor antagonists (SCH 23390 [2.0 microg, 5.0 microg]; eticlopride [2.0 microg, 5.0 microg]), or a combination of the 2 (SCH 23390 [2.0 microg, 5.0 microg] + 0.75 mg/kg amphetamine; eticlopride [2.0 microg, 5.0 microg] + 0.75 mg/kg amphetamine). Amphetamine produced comparable dose-related leftward shifts in the rate-frequency function for both P and NP rats, with a greater than 60% reduction observed in BSR threshold. On intervening days, baseline threshold was unaltered between tests and similar between rat lines. Unilateral infusion in the NAcc of either the D-sub-1 or D-sub-2 receptor antagonist produced rightward shifts in the rate-frequency function of amphetamine, completely reversing-attenuating its reward-enhancing effects. The results demonstrate that amphetamine produces similar threshold-lowering effects in both P and NP rats and that the reward-potentiating effects of amphetamine do not correlate with alcohol preference under the conditions of the present study.