Model-driven development, using languages such as UML and BON, often makes use of multiple diagrams (e.g., class and sequence diagrams) when modeling systems. These diagrams, presenting different views of a system of interest, may be inconsistent. A metamodel provides a unifying framework in which to ensure and check consistency, while at the same time providing the means to distinguish between valid and invalid models, that is, conformance. Two formal specifications of the metamodel for an object-oriented modeling language are presented, and it is shown how to use these specifications for model conformance and multiview consistency checking. Comparisons are made in terms of completeness and the level of automation each provide for checking multiview consistency and model conformance. The lessons learned from applying formal techniques to the problems of metamodeling, model conformance, and multiview consistency checking are summarized.

The current informal semantics of the simple concurrent object-oriented programming (SCOOP) mechanism for Eiffel is described. We construct and discuss a model using the process algebra CSP. This model gives a more formal semantics for SCOOP than existed previously. We implement the model mechanically via a new tool called CSPsim. We examine two semantic variations of SCOOP: when and how far to pass locks, and when to wait for child calls to complete. We provide evidence that waiting for child calls to complete both unnecessarily reduces parallelism without any increase in safety and increases deadlocks involving callbacks. Through the creation and analysis of the model, we identify a number of ambiguities relating to reservations and the underlying run-time system and propose means to resolve them.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract