Background: The ability of negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique to differentiate between awake snorers with and without obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea (OSAH) was investigated.
Recently, it has been suggested that peak expiratory flow (PEF) may be determined by the wave speed flow-limiting mechanism. In six normal male subjects (age = 33 +/- 8 years) performing expiratory forced vital capacity (FVC) maneuvers, a negative expiratory pressure (NEP) of -10 cm H2O was randomly applied at the beginning of maximal expiration to assess changes in PEF as compared with baseline. During FVC maneuvers, the expiratory effort was measured by changes in esophageal pressure (Pes), as either peak expiratory Pes-Pes at end expiratory lung volume (DeltaPes(peak)) or maximal rate of rise of Pes (dPes/dt(max)). In each experimental condition, at least three FVC maneuvers with comparable expiratory effort were selected for analysis for each subject. With similar DeltaPes(peak) (107.2 +/- 34.9 versus 111.7 +/- 40.5 cm H2O) and dPes/dt(max) (1181 +/- 518 versus 1177 +/- 546 cm H2O/second) PEF amounted to 10.84 +/- 1.08 L/second and to 10.82 +/- 1.03 L/second with and without NEP, respectively. These data show that PEF obtained by normal subjects to the best of their abilities (best PEF) does not increase with NEP and indicate that the best PEF is a flow-limited and effort-independent parameter, reflecting only lung and airways mechanics as the other subsequent maximal expiratory flows achieved during the FVC maneuver.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.