The purpose of the present study was to assess in a clinical trial over 5 years the results following 4 different modalities of periodontal therapy (pocket elimination or reduction surgery, modified Widman flap surgery, subgingival curettage, and scaling and rool planing). 90 patients were treated. The treatment methods were applied on a random basis to each of the 4 quadrants of the dentition. The patients were given professional tooth cleaning and oral hygiene instructions every 3 months. Pocket depth and attachment levels were scored once a year. 72 patients completed the 5 years of observation. Both patient means for pocket depth and attachment level as well as % distribution of sites with loss of attachment greater than or equal to 2 mm and greater than or equal to 3 mm were compared. For 1-3 mm probing depth, scaling and root planing, as well as subgingival curettage led to significantly less attachment loss than pocket elimination and modified Widman flap surgery. For 4-6 mm pockets, scaling and root planing and curettage had better attachment results than pocket elimination surgery. For the 7-12 mm pockets, there was no statistically significant difference among the results following the various procedures.

The utilization of AZM in combination with SRP improves the efficacy of non-surgical periodontal therapy in reducing probing depth and improving attachment levels in smokers with moderate to advanced attachment loss.

Results of various modalities of periodontal therapy were studied in 90 subjects (mean age 45 years) with moderate to severe periodontitis. Initial measurements of pocket depth and clinical attachment levels were compared with measurements obtained after the initial hygienic phase of the treatment and measurements of the same areas 1 and 2 years after four different types of periodontal treatment had been applied on a randomized basis to each of the four quadrants of the dentition. These treatments were: (1) surgical pocket elimination or reduction, (2) modified Widman flap surgery. (3) subgingival curettage, (4) scaling and root planing only. The patients were recalled for prophylaxis every 3 months, and rescored annually. One-way analysis of variance and Scheffe's method were used to test the hypothesis of equal treatment effects. The results were analyzed both with initial pocket depth as the baseline and with pocket depth at the hygienic phase as the baseline using a grouping of pockets 1 to 3 mm, 4 to 6 mm, and greater than or equal to 7 mm. For the 1 to 3 mm pockets there was a slight reduction in depth at the hygienic phase, with only minor changes after the various modalities of treatment over 2 years. However, significant losses of attachment after all modalities of periodontal therapy, including scaling alone, were observed at both the 1-year an 2-year intervals. For pockets 4 to 6 mm deep, the main reduction in pocket depth occurred at the hygienic phase, but the pockets also were reduced by further treatment, most by pocket elimination and modified Widman surgery. However, this reduction in pocket depth after surgery had no beneficial influence on maintenance of the attachment level, which actually was maintained best by scaling alone. For deep pockets greater than or equal to 7 mm, significant reduction in pocket depth occurred both at the hygienic phase and 1 to 2 years after treatment, with the greatest initial reduction after pocket elimination surgery. However, again there was no significant difference in attachment results among the four methods.

Longitudinal studies have reported the effect of various modalities of periodontal surgery on pocket depth and attachment levels related to pretreatment measurements. However, possible changes in these measurements as a result of scaling, oral hygiene improvements and occlusal adjustment during the hygienic phase were not considered. The purpose of the present study was to examine the short-term effect of treatment of the hygienic phase in 90 patients with some pockets extending 4 mm or more apically to the CEJ. Pretreatment pocket depths and attachment levels related to the CEJ were measured by a thin probe in five sites at all 2,355 teeth in the sample. Scaling, root planing, instruction in oral hygiene and occlusal adjustment were completed during four to six sessions for each patient. Four weeks after completion of the hygienic phase, all variables were recorded. Mean measurements for pocket depths 1-3 mm, 4-6 mm, and greater than or equal to 7 mm prior to treatment were compared to their posttreatment scores. Pocket depth decreased significantly for pockets extending 4 mm or more apically to the FGM. For pockets 4-6 mm there was a mean difference in pocket depth of 0.96 +/- 0.47 mm (P < .0001) between pretreatment and posttreatment observations. For pockets 7 mm or greater the mean difference was 2.22 +/- 1.35 mm (P < .0001). Reduction in depth of pocket and improvement in attachment levels were related to the initial level of severity. Pocket reduction was in part due to the improvement in attachment levels. This study has demonstrated that the clinical severity of periodontitis is reduced significantly 1 month following the hygienic phase of periodontal therapy, and that need for surgical pocket treatment cannot be assessed properly until completion of the hygienic phase of treatment.

No abstract