Background Current literature presents conflicting results regarding the clinical manifestations of coinfection with Babesia microti (Babesiosis) and Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease). The aim of this study is to investigate the effect that coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease has on standard and novel biomarkers markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and procalcitonin (Pc), which may assist in elucidating how these pathogens interact within human hosts. Methods Babesia cases were collected from Stony Brook University Hospital from 2012 to 2019. Cases of Babesia were included if parasites were detected by peripheral blood smear and confirmed by PCR. Lyme disease diagnosis criteria involved 2-tier testing per CDC guidelines. Cases were divided into three cohorts based on if they had CRP, ESR or Pc tested. Cohorts were divided into two groups: Babesiosis alone vs coinfection with Lyme Disease. Median values were analyzed for the following biomarkers across both groups: parasitemia, hemoglobin (Hgb), white blood cells (WBC), platelets, indirect bilirubin (IB), lactate dehydrogenase, ESR, CRP and Pc. Fisher Exact and Wilcoxon Rank sum tests were used and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results ESR values trended higher in monoinfection compared to coinfection (50 vs 36 mm/hr, p=0.63). Within this cohort, the coinfection group had significantly lower platelet values compared to monoinfection (52 vs. 75.5 K/uL, p=0.04, Table 1). Within the CRP and Pc cohorts, monoinfection had higher trends of parasitemia compared to coinfection (CRP group: 1.6 vs 0.7%, p=0.14, Pc group: 1.4 vs 0.7% p=1.0, Table 2&3). Pc levels were similar in both groups (1.1 vs 1.2 ng/mL, p=1.0, Table 3). Table 1: Demographics and Biomarkers for Patients with Babesiosis Monoinfection vs. Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease that had ESR Measured. Table 2: Demographics and Biomarkers for Patients with Babesiosis Monoinfection vs. Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease that had CRP Measured. Table 3: Demographics and Biomarkers for Patients with Babesiosis Alone vs Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease that had Procalcitonin Measured. Conclusion Coinfection had significantly lower platelets within the ESR cohort but not in other cohorts. While not statistically significant, monoinfection showed greater trends of ESR and parasitemia, which is consistent with previous studies that suggest that B. burgdorferi may mitigate the effects of B. microti infection. CRP and Pc levels were similar across both groups suggesting that the utility of using novel biomarkers to elucidate the interaction between B. burgdorferi and B. microti during simultaneous infection requires further study. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Background Research is currently lacking on the interplay between Babesiosis and Lyme disease (LD) and how this coinfection may translate into morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical features of patients with single-infection with Babesia microti to those co-infected with Borrelia burgdorferi and Babesia microti. Methods A retrospective review of all adult patients diagnosed with babesiosis and tested for LD at Stony Brook University Hospital between 2014 and 2019 was performed (n=40). Patients with single babesia infection (Group 1, n=22) were compared to those with Babesia and LD (Group 2, n=18). Babesiosis diagnosis was determined by microscopic visualization of Babesia spp under peripheral blood smear, and confirmed by PCR for B. microti. LD inclusion criteria included a positive screened ELISA test for lyme followed by positive IgM antibody by western blot per CDC criteria (2-3 positive bands). Statistical analysis of the data involved Fisher exact test, Chi-square test, independent t-test, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Statistical significance was considered as a p-value less than 0.05. Results There was no significant difference in gender, race, and age (p >.75) between both groups as well as comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, heart conditions, and immunocompromised state (p=1.0). Maximum parasitemia (Group 1: 1.1%, Group 2: 1.7%, p= 0.26) and percentage admitted to the ICU (Group 1: 18.18%, Group 2: 22.22%, p=1.0) were similar among both groups. While lab values on admission including WBC, hemoglobin, platelets, LDH, ALT, and AST did not significantly differ (p >.09), the length of hospital stay in group 2 was significantly longer than group 1 (Group 1: 3.0 days, Group 2: 5.5 days; p=0.03). There was a 0% mortality rate among both groups. Table 2: Biomarkers of Patients Monoinfected with Babesiosis Versus Patients Coinfected with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease. Table 1: Demographics of Patients Monoinfected with Babesiosis Versus Patients Coinfected with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease. Conclusion It is remarkable that despite no differences in lab values on admission, comorbidities, and demographics, patients with a coinfection had a longer hospital stay than those with only babesiosis. This suggests that having a coinfection with babesiosis and LD may lead to a more severe illness than a single infection with babesiosis. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Background Babesiosis has gained attention as an emerging protozoal zoonotic disease with an expanding known incidence and geographical range in the US. The infection is caused by Babesia microti in the US and is transmitted by the bite of Ixodes ticks, and occasionally by blood transfusion. The diagnosis is usually established by microscopic examination of a stained blood smear to see intraerythrocytic organisms. The level of parasitemia is only loosely correlated with clinical severity. Anecdotal reports suggest that HDL cholesterol levels decline during acute babesiosis. In this study, we report cholesterol levels in a series of patients with acute babesiosis with the hypothesis that HDL levels may be a potential biomarker for more severe infections. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed at Stony Brook University Hospital and Stony Brook Southampton Hospital between 2013 and 2018. Inclusion criteria was defined as a case of acute Babesia infection proven by peripheral blood smear microscopy and who had a lipid profile drawn during presentation to the emergency department. Cholesterol levels that were measured either before or after the infection (at least 1 month apart) were also recorded to compare to the levels reported during acute infection. Results A total of 40 patients (27.5% female) met criteria for acute Babesia infection. Fifteen (37.5%) had a history of splenectomy. The patients were divided into two groups for comparisons based on the treating physician’s clinical decision: 32 patients who were admitted to the hospital and 8 patients who were not-admitted. History of hypertension was more common in admitted than non-admitted patients (37% vs. 17%, Chi-square test p=0.02); the median levels of LDL and HDL were more reduced in admitted than non-admitted patients (46 vs 76 mg/dL, p=0.04 and 9 vs 28.5 mg/dL, p=0.03, based on t-test respectively) Conclusion LDL and HDL levels are significantly reduced in acute babesiosis, and LDL levels are inversely proportional to the parasitemia, suggesting that low levels of LDL may predict worsening disease in babesiosis. The mechanism of this phenomenon is unknown. Further prospective studies are needed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.