No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Participants' representations of the concept human were examined to differentiate three types of associations between concepts and their component attributes: the capacity of concepts to cue attributes (attribute accessibility), the capacity of attributes to cue concepts (instance accessibility), and the extent to which attributes are thought of as central to concepts (attribute centrality), The findings provide information about the concept human itself and, more generally, about the functionally distinct roles those different attribute-concept associations play in guiding imaginative thought. College students listed attributes that differentiate humans from other animals, rated the centrality of those attributes, and listed animals that possess those attributes. Other students drew and described extraterrestrials that possessed some of the attributes that were found to vary across those listing and rating tasks, Rated centrality was the most important determinant of an attribute's impact on imaginative generation. When the imagined extraterrestrials were supposed to possess attributes that had been rated as central to humans (intelligence, emotional complexity, or opposable thumbs), participants projected more aspects of human form onto them than when the creatures were supposed to possess less central attributes or when attributes were unspecified.Man is distinguished from other animals by his imaginative gifts ... We are nature's unique experiment to make the rational intelligence prove itself sounder than the reflex.-Jacob Bronowski, The Ascent ofMan, 1973

Gender asymmetry in touch in U.S. populations is related to the age of the participants in some studies and to the relationships between the participants in others. In the present study, researchers observed dyads in public settings in the United States frequented by couples and recorded the occurrence of touch, the touch initiator, and the body areas touched. The researchers then approached the couples and asked them to complete questionnaires indicating their ages, their relationship, and their level of agreement on major issues. Age and relationship were predictive of the gender of touch initiators. Although levels of agreement were less predictive of touch initiation, the women indicated higher levels of agreement than the men did. The results were generally consistent with a model of sex differences in reproductive strategies.