Given the similar baseline performance of faculty and medical students, the ability to interpret facial expressions does not appear to be learned through routine clinical practice, highlighting the need for dedicated facial expression training. The authors were able to demonstrate that physicians and physicians-in-training could effectively learn to recognize emotion by interpreting facial expressions through a short workshop.
Background: Most youth with chronic illness will survive into adulthood. The complexity of the medical history and care in these patients necessitates a well-planned and coordinated transition over several years as they move from pediatric to adult-oriented health care. Methods: We assessed pediatric residents’ practice patterns and attitudes regarding transition communication by administering a survey about transition to pediatric, combined internal medicine-pediatrics, pediatric neurology, and combined psychiatry-child psychiatry-pediatric residents. Results: Among 110 residents who were contacted, 66 completed the survey, for a response rate of 61%. Surveyed residents report discussing transition with their patients when their patients are age 18 or older, when guidelines suggest a discussion should begin around age 12. Most residents felt that transition should be initially addressed one year prior to transfer. Residents also reported barriers such as lack of experience with transition and lack of role modeling by supervisors as barriers to providing transitional care. Conclusions: The practice patterns and attitudes of pediatric residents in this study do not reflect the recommendations that have been published regarding transitional care services to prepare patients and families for transfer from pediatric to adult-oriented care. In particular, most residents report that they start transition discussions when a patient is near the age of 18, rather than the age of 12 as guidelines suggest and as families would prefer. Pediatric residents need further education regarding transition, with particular emphasis on the need for early and frequent discussions with patients and families regarding transition.
Background The development of autonomy is a key component of residency training. Although studies have examined levels of graduated autonomy within specialties, they have not, to our knowledge, examined how residents' perceptions of autonomy differ among specialties. Objective We surveyed residents in internal medicine–pediatrics programs to determine their perceptions of the autonomy they experienced when they were serving on internal medicine (IM) and pediatrics inpatient rotations. Methods In 2012, we administered a 24-item online survey to residents in 36 internal medicine–pediatrics programs. Results Of 698 eligible residents, 143 (20.5%) participated. Participants were distributed equally among all 4 postgraduate years and between IM and pediatrics rotations. Participants were more likely to agree they experienced an appropriate level of autonomy when they were on IM rotations than when they were on pediatrics rotations (97.9% versus 34.3%, P < .001), were more likely to report experiencing frustration with too little oversight while on IM rotations (32.9% versus 2.2%, P < .001), and were more likely to report experiencing frustration with too much oversight while on pediatrics rotations (48.2% versus 0.7%, P < .001). Responses to items that described frequently encountered circumstances and hypothetical medical cases indicated participants were more likely to feel anxiety and discomfort with autonomous decision making while on pediatrics rotations. Conclusions Residents in internal medicine–pediatrics programs perceive significant differences in the autonomy they experience during IM and pediatrics rotations. This may influence their confidence in medical decision making.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.