No abstract

Background: Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic metabolic disorder, one of the major causes of morbidity, mortality and needs lifelong treatment. There are large numbers of oral anti-diabetic drugs available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. There are numerous brands available for each of the individual oral anti-diabetic drug. Thus, a study was planned to find out cost variation among different brands of same active oral anti-diabetic drug.Methods: Cost of a particular drug being manufactured by different companies, in the same strength and dosage forms was obtained from the price list provided by the pharmaceutical companies in Current Index of Medical Specialities (CIMS) (October 2017- January 2018). The difference in the maximum and minimum price of the same drug manufactured by different pharmaceutical companies and percentage variation in price was analyzed.Results: Percentage cost variation of the commonly used drugs found was seen highest with Sulfonylureas (Glimepiride - 562%) followed by Metformin (492%) which was followed by Pioglitazone (488%), DPP-4 inhibitor Teneligliptin (231%), α- glucosidase inhibitors (Voglibose 284%), Meglitinides (Repaglinide 0.5mg 154%) and lowest was seen with Repaglinide 2mg (15%).Conclusions: There is very wide cost variation among different brands of the same oral anti-diabetic drugs manufactured in India. The average percentage cost variation of different brands of the same oral anti diabetic drugs manufactured in India is very wide. The appraisal and management of marketing drugs should be directed toward maximizing the benefits of therapy and minimizing negative personal and economic consequences.

INTRODUCTIONGlaucoma is the "silent thief of sight." It is the second leading cause of blindness globally, 1 accounts for 12.3% of total blindness. 2 The estimated number of people with vision loss from glaucoma range from 5.2 to 6.7 million. 3If left undiagnosed and untreated there is slow progressive degeneration of retinal ganglion cells and the optic nerve axons, leading to irreversible blindness.Prevalence of glaucoma varies between 1% and 4% in people over 40, and they increase with age. The incidence rate is estimated to be 0.1% per year. 4 Several randomized controlled trials have determined that reduction in IOP can delay glaucomatous nerve or field damage.5-7 Normal intraocular pressure ranges from 10 to 2 mmHg. Data from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial have shown that an additional 1 mmHg of IOP lowering reduces the risk of glaucoma progression by 10%.7 Lowering of IOP remains ABSTRACTBackground: The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy of topically applied travoprost 0.004% eye drops versus brimonidine/timolol fixed combination eye drops in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma. Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, 65 patients received either travoprost eye drops once daily in the morning (n=33) or brimonidine/timolol fixed combination eye drops twice daily (n=32). Intra ocular pressure (IOP) was assessed at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was mean reduction in IOP. Results:The baseline mean IOP values were similar between two groups. Mean reduction of IOP in the right eye for brimonidine/timolol fixed combination group was 9±2.9 mmHg, whereas in the left eye it was 10.9±2.8 mmHg. In the travoprost group, the reduction in IOP of the right eye was 7.8±2.9 mmHg (p=0.0002) and 7.5±3.4 mmHg (p=0.0001) in the left eye. The mean reduction of IOP for the brimonidine/timolol group was 9.95 mmHg and for the travoprost group it was 7.6 mmHg (p<0.0001) in both the eyes. Conclusions:The fixed combination brimonidine/timolol twice daily demonstrated superior mean IOP lowering efficacy compared to travoprost 0.004% in patients with open-angle glaucoma.

Background and Objective: Hypercholesterolemia is one of the major risk factor for atherosclerotic coronary heart disease, especially coronary heart disease. Most effective class of medications for prevention of cardiovascular events and LDL-C reduction are the statins. Approximately only one fourth of these high risk patients had achieved LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL with statins. Monoclonal antibody targeting PCSK9 is a novel class of drug used in the treatment of Hypercholesterolemia. Alirocumab is one such human monoclonal antibody directed against PCSK9. Binding of PCSK9 to the LDL-R on the hepatocytes promotes LDL-R degradation. Inhibition of PCSK9 binding to LDL-R leads to increased number of LDL-Rs to clear LDL, thus decreasing LDL-C levels. The purpose of this systematic study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Alirocumab in adults with hypercholesterolemia and Familial hypercholesterolemia. Materials and Methods: We searched Medline, PubMed Central database, Google scholar, EBSCO, Wiley library, conference proceedings and Clinical trials.gov registry through March 2017. Phase 3 randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) using Alirocumab in adults with hypercholesterolemia and Familial Hypercholesterolemia were selected. Results: In twelve RCTs comprising of 6019 patients included in the meta-analysis, significant favorable changes in LDL-C and HDL-C were found. Limitations: Results were derived from study level data rather than patient level data. Conclusions: Alirocumab substantially reduced the LDL-C level by over 50 %, increased the HDL-C level, and resulted in favorable changes in other lipids.