Posterior plate osteosynthesis is a sufficiently stable method for the treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with a low risk of iatrogenic nervous tissue and vascular lesions. The disadvantages are limited reduction possibilities, the necessity of bilateral bridging of the sacroiliac joint in a unilateral injury, as well as a higher rate of symptomatic hardware.

Application of a clinical algorithm focusing on basic radiologic diagnostics, external fixation, and early angiographic embolization was effective and safe to rapidly control hemorrhage in hemodynamically instable trauma patients with pelvic fractures.

Our findings substantiate application of the noninvasive patient immobilization and stereotactic targeting system as effective in computer-assited percutaneous stabilization of sacral bone fractures/SI joint disruptions and coronally oriented acetabular dome fractures. We recommend according to the ALARA (as low as reasonable achievable) principle: first, the kV and mAs values have to be reduced. Second, the scanned volume has to be strictly limited to the area of interest. Third, the number of control CTs have to be minimized. Also, the IsoC might be a better choice for implant tracking below 12 cm to reduce the radiation dose to the minimum. We believe that for all high-precise GP placements in the acetabular column area, further improvements in GP guidance (inhibiting pin tip slipping and detecting intraosseous GP deflection) are necessary.

34 patients with an average age of 42.6 years were treated according to the described method from 1998 to 2005; 18 were polytraumatized. The anterior pelvic ring was also stabilized by surgery in 28 patients for eleven of whom it was the first intervention in a two-stage procedure. 25 patients were available for clinical and radiologic follow-up at 17 months, on average. The plain radiographs after 1 year showed a very good outcome in 16 patients (maximal displacement of the posterior pelvic ring < 5 mm) and a good outcome in eight patients (displacement of 5-10 mm). In two patients there was loss of reduction in the 1st postoperative year despite a very good reduction result immediately postoperatively (dislocation < 5 mm), whereby the dislocation for one patient was < 10 mm on the final radiograph and 19 mm for the other. One patient presented with a late infection 11 weeks postoperatively that healed after implant removal and wound debridement. In two other patients, prominent screw heads, which were used for refixation of the osteotomized posterior superior iliac spine, had to be removed under local anesthesia in the 10th postoperative week. The further course for these two patients was uneventful. In one patient the implants were retrieved in the 5th postoperative month because the patient complained of internal hot and cold sensations although the soft tissue was not irritated. The plates were removed in six other cases after the fracture/instability had healed, i. e., after 9-12 months, on average; in all other cases the implants were left in situ.