Question: The evolution of general flowering and mast fruiting of dipterocarps in tropical rain forest has been explained by different mechanisms. We studied whether the abundance of flowering conspecifics influences the recruitment success of tropical forest trees in Borneo. Location: Sepilok Forest Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia. Method: We examined the recruitment success of 17 species of Dipterocarpaceae in a 640–ha sample area over two flowering events in 2001–2002 using seed traps and quadrats. Seed predation experiments were used to investigate if post‐dispersal seed survival was density‐dependent. Results: We found a negative relationship between the percentage of flowers abscised per individual and the number of flowering conspecifics and a positive relationship between the percent of flowering trees that produced viable seeds and the number of flowering conspecifics. However, we found no evidence of decreasing pre‐ and post‐dispersal predation with increasing numbers of flowering conspecifics. High levels of flower abscission, and pre‐ and post‐dispersal seed mortality, resulted in near‐complete recruitment failure of most species, with only three species successfully recruiting in only one year. One of these, Parashorea tomentella, satiated seed predators over a large area, while Hopea beccariana and Shorea multiflora only recruited in small isolated clumps. Seed predation experiments suggest that post‐dispersal seed survival was positively density‐dependent in the short‐term. Conclusions: Increased density of flowering conspecifics may contribute to increased likelihood of successful cross‐pollination during low intensity flowering events and, in some cases, to enhanced probability of short‐term seed and seedling survival. Both processes may contribute to the evolution of mast fruiting and general flowering in Southeast Asian lowland dipterocarp forests.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.