No abstract

Ischemia/reperfusion injury, which is commonly seen in the field of renal surgery or transplantation, is a major cause of acute renal failure. The objective of the present study was to examine the role of nebivolol in modulating peroxynitrite species-induced inflammation and apoptosis after renal warm ischemia/ reperfusion injury in rats. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of nebivolol on the renal warm ischemia/ reperfusion injury in rats treated with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, N ω -nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. After right nephrectomy, nebivolol was administered for 15 days. On the 16 th day, ischemia was induced in contra lateral kidney for 45 min, followed by reperfusion for 24 hr. Renal function, inflammation, and apoptosis were estimated at the end of 24 hr reperfusion. Nebivolol improved the renal dysfunction and reduced inflammation and apoptosis after renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. In conclusion, nebivolol shows potent anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory properties due to its NO-releasing property. These findings may have major implications in the treatment of human ischemic acute renal failure.

PurposeThe liposomal formulation of doxorubicin [doxorubicin (DXR) hydrochloride (HCl) liposome injection, Caelyx®] alters the tissue distribution of DXR as compared with nonliposomal DXR, resulting in an improved benefit-risk profile. We conducted studies in murine models to compare the plasma and tissue distribution of a proposed generic DXR HCl liposome injection developed by Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited (SPIL DXR HCl liposome injection) with Caelyx®.MethodsThe plasma and tissue distributions of the SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injections were compared in syngeneic fibrosarcoma-bearing BALB/c mice and Sprague–Dawley rats. Different batches and different lots of the same batch of the reference product were also compared with each other.ResultsThe SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injections exhibited generally comparable plasma and tissue distribution profiles in both models. While minor differences were observed between the two products in some tissues, different batches and lots of the reference product also showed some differences in the distribution of various analytes in some tissues. The ratios of estimated free to encapsulated DXR for plasma and tissue were generally comparable between the SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injections in both models, indicating similar extents of absorption into the tissues and similar rates of drug release from liposomes.ConclusionsThe plasma and tissue distribution profiles of the SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injections were shown to be generally comparable. Inconsistencies between the products observed in some tissues were thought to be due to biological variation.

BackgroundDoxorubicin (DXR) hydrochloride (HCl) liposome injection is an important part of the treatment armamentarium for a number of cancers. With growing needs for affordable and effective anticancer treatments, the development of generics is becoming increasingly important to facilitate patient access to vital medications. We conducted studies in relevant mouse models of cancer to compare the preclinical antitumour efficacy and plasma pharmacokinetic profile of a proposed generic DXR HCl liposome injection developed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (SPIL DXR HCl liposome injection) with Caelyx® (reference DXR HCl liposome injection).MethodsSyngeneic fibrosarcoma (WEHI 164)-bearing BALB/c mice and athymic nude mice transplanted with MX-1 human mammary carcinoma xenografts were treated with SPIL DXR HCl liposome injection, reference DXR HCl liposome injection or placebo, to compare tumour volume, antitumour activity (percentage test/control [%T/C] ratio, tumour regression, and specific tumour growth delay) and toxicity (survival and weight changes) in response to treatment. The pharmacokinetic profile of the SPIL and reference product was also studied in syngeneic fibrosarcoma-bearing mice.ResultsTreatment with either SPIL or reference DXR HCl liposome injection resulted in significant reduction in tumour volume from baseline in both models at all doses tested. High antitumour activity (%T/C ≤ 10) was seen from Day 21 and Day 14 onwards in SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injection–treated syngeneic fibrosarcoma-bearing mice, respectively, at 9 mg/kg. Moderate antitumour activity (%T/C ≤ 20) was seen from Day 17 and Day 24 onwards in SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injection–treated MX-1-bearing mice, respectively, at 6 mg/kg. No significant differences in tumour volume and %T/C were observed between SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injection–treated groups at any dose (p ≥ 0.05). Toxicity profiles were considered to be generally comparable. Evaluation of test/reference (A/B) ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for peak serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞) demonstrated bioequivalence of SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injections.ConclusionsEstablishing similarity is of critical importance during the development of generic treatments. SPIL and reference DXR HCl liposome injections were shown to be comparable with regards to antitumour activity, toxicity and pharmacokinetics.

Introduction: Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CsA 0.09% sol) is approved to increase tear production in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. This study evaluated the efficacy of CsA 0.09% sol vs cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (CsA 0.05% eml) vs ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.1% (CsA 0.1% eml) in a NOD mice model. Methods: Mice were randomized and administered placebo, CsA 0.09% sol twice daily, CsA 0.05% eml twice daily, CsA 0.09% sol once daily, or CsA 0.1% eml once daily in the conjunctival sac of both eyes for 60 days. Tear volume was measured with phenol red threads at baseline and 4 hours after treatment every 15 days. On day 58, the corneal surface was observed under a slit-lamp after staining with 3% lissamine green administered into the inferior lateral conjunctival sac. On day 61, mice were euthanized, globes excised, sliced into 4 µm sections in 3 areas per section, and stained. Total number of stained goblet cell/µm was counted, and the sum per eye was averaged. Lacrimal gland tissues were removed and interleukin (IL) 1-β cytokine levels estimated. Results: Groups comprised 11 mice each, including an untreated normal and untreated diseased control group (7 groups total). CsA 0.09% sol twice daily significantly increased tear volume on day 30, 45, and 60 vs CsA 0.05% eml (P<0.05, <0.001, <0.001, respectively) and vs CsA 0.1% eml on day 60 (P<0.05); CsA 0.09% sol once daily significantly increased tear volume on day 45 vs CsA 0.05% eml (P<0.05). Goblet cell density significantly increased with CsA 0.09% sol twice daily vs placebo and NOD control (P<0.01 both). There was no significant difference in corneal staining and IL-1β levels with CsA 0.09% sol. Conclusion: Sixty-day treatment with CsA 0.09% sol showed comparatively improved preclinical results vs CsA 0.05% eml and CsA 0.1% eml.