No abstract

No abstract

Investment and human rights law share some features, notably, the fact that are asymmetrical by nature, as both grant individuals rights and protection from State interference while referring virtually all treaty obligations to the State. 1 But they also have important differences. Few human rights treaties provide access to international courts, and when they do, the exhaustion of local remedies is a precondition to bring a claim. Instead, in the majority of international investment agreements (IIAs), 2 the investor often has immediate access to investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) usually under the form of arbitration, 3 a truly 'anomaly' in the general context of international law. 4 While some legal research

Los autores declaran no tener conflictos de interés. Trabajo no recibió financiamiento.Resumen: Se presenta el caso clínico de un paciente que presenta un infarto del miocardio con trombolisis no exitosa y posterior implantación de 2 stents coronarios quien desarrolla, algunos días después, una tormenta eléctrica ventricular. Una ablación de la taquicardia se realizó bajo ECMO, con buen resultado. Se detalla la descripción del caso, revisa y discute el tema.A patient with a myocardial infarction whom, following a failed thrombolisis and implantion of 2 stents developed a ventricular electrical storm and hemodynamic instability. A successful ablation of the tachycardia with the use of ECMO was performed. A full description is included, along with a discussion of the subject.