Simple and low-cost interventions can considerably improve the clinical effectiveness of HCC screening programmes in real world settings. Clinical practice improvement principles appear to be a valid methodology for achieving this positive change.

Background: A unique model of care was adopted in Australia following introduction of universal subsidised direct-acting antiviral (DAA) access in 2016 in order to encourage rapid scale-up of treatment. Community-based medical practitioners and integrated hepatitis nurses initiated DAA treatment with remote hepatitis specialist approval of the planned treatment without physical review. Aims: To evaluate outcomes of community-based treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) through this remote consultation process in the first 12 months of this model of care. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing community-based HCV treatment from general practitioners and integrated hepatitis nurse consultants through the remote consultation model in three state jurisdictions in Australia from 1 March 2016 to 28 February 2017.Results: Sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12) was confirmed in 383 (65.1%) of 588 subjects intended for treatment with a median follow-up time of 12 months (interquartile range 9-14 months). The SVR12 test was not performed in 159 (27.0%) of 588 and 307 (52.2%) of 588 did not have liver biochemistry rechecked following treatment. Subjects who completed follow up exhibited high SVR12 rates (383/392; 97.7%). Nurse-led treatment was associated with higher confirmation of SVR12 (73.7% vs 62.4%; P = 0.01) and liver biochemistry testing post treatment (57.5% vs 45.0%; P = 0.01).Conclusions: Community-based management of HCV through remote specialist consultation may be an effective model of care. Failure to check SVR12, recheck liver biochemistry and appropriate surveillance in patients with cirrhosis may emerge as significant issues requiring further support, education and refinement of the model to maximise effectiveness of future elimination efforts.

Disseminating guidelines had little effect on primary prevention practice. Less than 1 year after a nurse coordinator was introduced to manage primary prevention, adherence to primary prevention guidelines increased from 13% to 79%. However, significant improvements in the management of acute variceal bleeding where medical staff have a clear responsibility for patient care were achieved through the development and dissemination of clear clinical protocols and the introduction of auditing and feedback mechanisms.

Background:  Hepatitis C treatment is successful in 40–80% of patients in drug sponsored registration trials. However, few studies have examined treatment outcomes in non‐trial, routine clinical practice settings. Aim:  The aim of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes and predictors of a sustained virological response in a routine clinical setting. Methods:  Data were collected retrospectively on patients treated for hepatitis C between January 2004 and March 2010 in a tertiary hospital setting. Demographics, treatment outcomes and potential predictors of outcome (viral genotype, viral load, virological response, platelet count, alanine transaminase level, glucose, ferritin, weight, fibrosis and cirrhosis, compliance, dose reductions, adverse events, psychiatric and alcohol history) were recorded. Univariate and multiple logistic regressions were performed. Results:  A total of 405 patients was treated during the study period. On an intention to treat basis, sustained virological response rates were 55%, 82% and 72% in genotypes 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Predictors of response were gender, age, genotype, weight, fibrosis, cirrhosis, platelet count and alanine transaminase on univariate analysis. Age, genotype, cirrhosis and platelet count were independently associated with sustained virological response on multiple logistic regression. Conclusion:  In our cohort, treatment outcomes for genotype 1 and 2 were similar to results from clinical trials but results for genotype 3 were inferior. Clinicians should not assume that results from registration trials are transferable to their own clinical practice. This has particular relevance for the new era of triple therapy regimens containing direct antivirals.

Boceprevir can be used successfully in PR treatment failures with a SVR12 > 80% if they have good on-treatment responses; however, discontinuations occurred in 30% because of virological failure or adverse events.