This systematic review studies the relationship between vitamin D serum levels and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The primary source of vitamin D is sunlight exposure. Recently, an increase in the intake of vitamin D supplements has been noticed. The protective value of vitamin D is well established and has been studied several times for the health of the bones, cartilage, growth, various dermatological diseases, and also as a chemoprotective agent against several cancers. On the scientific front, it has yet to be established that increasing serum vitamin D levels increase the incidence of BCC. We included reports that investigated this relationship in this review. We applied keywords in published papers in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Google Scholar to find relevant studies. After applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and the quality appraisal for 68 records, we included only ten studies. In these studies, serum levels of vitamin D were measured. Five of them supported the link between BCC incidence and development and high serum vitamin D levels (e.g., Mahamat-Saleh Y, et al.), while the other five did not (e.g., Tang JY, et al.). We included only two studies that investigated the vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphism. Experts debate adding a high dose of vitamin D supplements to our daily routine. After studying most of the reports, it was ascertained that the literature supports keeping vitamin D serum levels below 30-60 nmol/L. However, further studies should be done to help find a healthy balance of vitamin D serum levels, especially when it comes to increasing the risk of cancer like BCC.

Those who received early diagnosis and treatment for poststroke depression had lower mortality rates, cognitive impairments, improved long-term disability, a higher quality of life, and lower rates of suicidal thoughts than those who did not. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 standards were used to conduct this systematic review. Until May 1, 2022, a systematic search was conducted utilizing ScienceDirect, Cochrane, PubMed, Google Scholar, and PubMed central databases, which have been used during the previous 10 years. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, systematic reviews, review articles, case reports, clinical studies, and meta-analyses were included in the research, which covered post-stroke depression patients and how to identify and treat them.There were 545 possibly related titles found in the database search. Finally, each publication was given a quality rating, and 10 studies with a score of higher than 70% were allowed into the review. Because of their brevity and ease of use, they employed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and PHQ-2 screening instruments in stroke patients. According to pooled studies, the risk of acquiring post-stroke depression (PSD) was lower in participants undergoing pharmacological therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), especially after a year. Identifying further features of the PSD process, we believe, is the most pressing need for future study since it might lead to a more precise treatment strategy.

A frequent complication in kidney transplantation is post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). The primary goal of this study is to review the risk factors and preventive methods and compare the different available anti-diabetic medications for the management of PTDM. We searched databases like Pubmed and Google Scholar for related articles using specific terms and phrases. Following a thorough investigation, we applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and completed a quality assessment.Modifiable risk factors have a significant role in the development of PTDM. The combinations of immunosuppressive treatment tacrolimus (TAC), cyclosporine A (CYC), and everolimus (EVL), steroids increase the incidence of PTDM significantly. Insulin is the most effective treatment for PTDM in the early transplant period; however, oral anti-diabetic medications look promising. Further clinical trials are required to determine the optimum treatment method for reducing the occurrence of PTDM and treating the existing condition with novel anti-hyperglycemic medications.

Metformin and sulphonylureas are the most commonly used first-line anti-diabetic agents. However, medical practice guidelines and clinical experience caution against using these drugs in severe diabetic kidney disease. Consequently, the choice of anti-diabetic medicine in various stages of diabetic nephropathy should balance the benefits and risks to the patient. We aim to synthesize available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of metformin concerning sulfonylureas in patients with diabetic renal disease. The COSMOS-E (Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology) and MOOSE (Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines were followed when designing the systematic review. The present study assessed the effectiveness of metformin and sulphonylurea monotherapy regarding renal function. Studies published from 2001 to 2022 were included. We have identified 570 records from PubMed, BioMed Central, LILACS (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde), ScienceDirect, and PLoS (The Public Library of Science) Medicine databases. Eight cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies reported adjusted hazard ratios with confidence limits. Metformin was found to be more effective in the following events: allcause mortality, GFR (glomerular filtration rate), ESRD (end-stage renal disease) or death events, one-year risk of death or end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalization, and hypoglycemic episodes. However, metformin was less effective in acute renal replacement therapy, endstage renal disease, and/or death, with a one-year risk of acute dialysis. Lactic acidosis was not significant with metformin. The present study recommends that metformin therapy is safe compared to sulfonylurea therapy in diabetic nephropathy patients, provided that the contraindications given in the guidelines are strictly adhered to.