The present work examines the spatial and temporal distribution of positive and negative TEC anomalies on the global and regional scale. To study the local response of the ionosphere, foF2 data from ground ionosonde stations and TEC data from Madrigal and CODE databases have been used. The relative deviation, which also determines the type of TEC response during geomagnetic storms on 3 and 4 February 2022, is considered. In the present study, the regions of positive and negative TEC anomalies and their evolution during storms are examined in detail. As a result of the study, estimates of the following were obtained: (i) the location of the sectors of the polar regions, in where the particle precipitation from the solar wind is observed, (ii) the mid-latitude regions, in which the mechanism of influence of the O/N2 ratio dominates, and (iii) the region around the equator, in which the influence of the electric field dominates. An attempt was made to determine which mechanism of influence of geomagnetic storms on the ionospheric electron density is dominant in different regions. The following main mechanisms are considered: (a) the additional ionization from the particles’ precipitation, (b) the change of the ratio of atomic oxygen (O) to molecular nitrogen (N2) due to the heating of the neutral air, and (c) the influence on the equatorial ionospheric anomaly.

No abstract

A study of the behavior of the main characteristics of the ionosphere over Europe during the 26–28 February 2023 ionospheric storm was carried out in this present work. The additional influence of sudden stratospheric warming on the ionosphere was considered. The behavior of the critical frequency of the ionosphere foF2 (characterizing the maximum electron density), the peak height of the F2-layer (hmF2), and Total Electron Content (TEC) were investigated through their relative deviations from the quiet conditions. The behavior of the TEC over Europe showed the geographic latitudinal dependence of the response. The variability in the ionospheric critical frequency was represented by the data of 10 ionospheric stations for vertical sounding located in two groups: (i) near the prime meridian and (ii) near the 25° E meridian. Some differences were found in the response compared to the TEC response, which was explained by the different responses of the top maximum region and bottom maximum region. The peak height of the F2 layer varied strongly during the storm, which was due to the forced drift of ionospheric plasma induced by additional electric fields. The present detailed analysis of the ionospheric response shows that the considered storm exhibited characteristic features inherent in the winter season but with some manifestations of reactions in equinox conditions.

No abstract