Главный редактор член-корреспондент АН РТ, доктор исторических наук А.Г. Ситдиков Заместители главного редактора: член-корреспондент АН РТ, доктор исторических наук Ф.Ш. Хузин доктор исторических наук Ю.А. Зеленеев Ответственный секретарь-кандидат ветеринарных наук Г.Ш. Асылгараева Редакционный совет: Б.А. Байтанаев-академик НАН РК, доктор исторических наук (Алматы, Казахстан) (председатель), Р.С. Хакимов-вице-президент АН РТ (Казань, Россия), Х.А. Амирханов-член-корреспондент РАН, доктор исторических наук, профессор (Москва, Россия), И. Бальдауф-доктор наук, профессор (Берлин, Германия), С.Г. Бочаров-кандидат исторических наук (Казань, Россия), П. Георгиев-доктор наук, доцент (Шумен, Болгария), Е.П. Казаков-доктор исторических наук (Казань, Россия), Н.Н. Крадин-членкорреспондент РАН, доктор исторических наук, профессор (Владивосток, Россия), А. Тюрк-PhD (Будапешт, Венгрия), И. Фодор-доктор исторических наук, профессор (Будапешт, Венгрия), В.Л. Янин-академик РАН, доктор исторических наук профессор (Москва, Россия), В.С. Синика-кандидат исторических наук (Тирасполь, Молдова), Б.В. Базаров-академик РАН доктор исторических наук, профессор (Улан-Удэ, Бурятия), Д.С. Коробов-доктор исторических наук, профессор РАН (Москва, Россия), П. Дегри-профессор (Лёвен, Бельгия), Вэй Джан-Ph.D, профессор (Пекин, Китай). Редакционная коллегия: А.А. Выборнов-доктор исторических наук, профессор (Самара, Россия) М.Ш. Галимова-кандидат исторических наук (Казань, Россия) Р.Д. Голдина-доктор исторических наук, профессор (Ижевск, Россия) И.Л. Измайлов-доктор исторических наук (Казань, Россия) С.В. Кузьминых-кандидат исторических наук (Москва, Россия) А.Е. Леонтьев-доктор исторических наук (Москва, Россия) Т.Б. Никитина-доктор исторических наук (Йошкар-Ола, Россия) Ответственный за выпуск: Ф.Ш. Хузин-член-корреспондент АН РТ, доктор исторических наук (Казань, Россия)

The first part of the article briefly covers the history of immigration to France, social conflicts associated with migrants, and the results of French research on discrimination of immigrants in employment. In spite of the high unemployment rate, compared with other European Union countries, France remains one of the centres of migration and receives a significant number of migrants and refugees every year. The origins of immigration to France go back to the mid-19th century. Initially, it was mainly for political reasons, in order to find a job or receive an education. Between the First and the Second World Wars, France accepted both political (e.g. from Russia, Germany and Spain) and labour migrants (from Africa and Indo-China). After World War II, the French government actively invited labour migrants from the French colonies, primarily, from North Africa (Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco). When the Algerian War ended, the Harkis – Algerians who served in the French Army – found refuge in France. By the late 1960s, the Moroccan and Tunisian communities were formed. Up to the 1980s, labour migration was predominant. However, with time, the share of refugees and those who wanted to move to France with their families started to increase. This caused a growing social and political tension in French society resulting in conflicts (e.g. the 2005 riots in Paris). Moreover, the numerous terrorist attacks and the migration crisis of 2014–2016 had a particularly negative impact on the attitude towards migrants. All these issues have to a certain extent affected the employment of the Muslim population in France.

Preservation of archaeological heritage objects (AHO) in Kuzbass is one of the tasks on the formation of a fund of objects of historical and cultural heritage of the Russian Federation. The paper characterizes the key challenges to AHO preservation, one of which is the so-called amateur "archaeological treasure hunting", and offers possible solutions. The research was based on law and media analysis. The contemporary legal framework of the Russian Federation provides the necessary conditions for AHO preservation. For instance, it regulates the procedure for search and extraction of artifacts from archeological sites. Amateur "archaeological treasure hunting" is illegal but extremely popular. The situation in Kuzbass stays within the national trends. However, the authors managed to define some regional specifics. First, the local treasure hunters demonstrate a high level of social publicity in their attempt to legalize their activities. Second, they focus mostly on Modern Age artifacts. The authors claim the urgency of the problem and propose a number of solutions, e.g. media marginalization of the " black archaeology", a targeted public protection of Modern Age archaeological sites, prompt interception of illegal "treasure hunting", etc.

No abstract

No abstract