Summary TGFβ induces phosphorylation of the transcription factors Smad2 and Smad3 at the C-terminus as well as at an interdomain linker region. TGFβ-induced linker phosphorylation marks the activated Smad proteins for proteasome-mediated destruction. Here we identify Nedd4L as the ubiquitin ligase responsible for this step. Through its WW domain Nedd4L specifically recognizes a TGFβ-induced phosphoThr-ProTyr motif in the linker region, resulting in Smad2/3 poly-ubiquitination and degradation. Nedd4L is not interchangeable with Smurf1, a ubiquitin ligase that targets BMP-activated, linker-phosphorylated Smad1. Nedd4L limits the half-life of TGFβ activated Smads, restricts the amplitude and duration of TGFβ gene responses, and in mouse embryonic stem cells limits the induction of mesoendodermal fates by Smad2/3-activating factors. Hierarchical regulation is provided by SGK1, which phosphorylates Nedd4L to prevent binding of Smad2/3. Previously identified as a regulator of renal sodium channels, Nedd4L is shown here to play a broader role as a general modulator of Smad turnover during TGFβ signal transduction.

SUMMARY The cellular response to DNA damage employs multiple dynamic protein modifications to exert rapid and adaptable effects. Substantial work has detailed the roles of canonical checkpoint-mediated phosphorylation in this program. Recent studies have also implicated sumoylation in the DNA damage response; however, a systematic view of the contribution of sumoylation to replication and repair and its interplay with checkpoints is lacking. Here, using a biochemical screen in yeast, we establish that DNA damage-induced sumoylation occurs on a large scale. We identify MRX (Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2) as a positive regulator of this induction for a subset of repair targets. In addition, we find that defective sumoylation results in failure to complete replication of a damaged genome and impaired DNA end processing, highlighting the importance of the SUMO-mediated response in genome integrity. We also show that DNA damage-induced sumoylation does not require Mec1 checkpoint signaling, and the presence of both enables optimal DNA damage resistance.

No abstract

Recombination is important for repairing DNA lesions, yet it can also lead to genomic rearrangements. This process must be regulated, and recently, sumoylation-mediated mechanisms were found to inhibit Rad51-dependent recombination. Here, we report that the absence of the Slx5-Slx8 complex, a newly identified player in the SUMO (small ubiquitin-like modifier) pathway, led to increased Rad51-dependent and Rad51-independent recombination. The increases were most striking during S phase, suggesting an accumulation of DNA lesions during replication. Consistent with this view, Slx8 protein localized to replication centers. In addition, like SUMO E2 mutants, slx8⌬ mutants exhibited clonal lethality, which was due to the overamplification of 2m, an extrachromosomal plasmid. Interestingly, in both SUMO E2 and slx8⌬ mutants, clonal lethality was rescued by deleting genes required for Rad51-independent recombination but not those involved in Rad51-dependent events. These results suggest that sumoylation negatively regulates Rad51-independent recombination, and indeed, the Slx5-Slx8 complex affected the sumoylation of several enzymes involved in early steps of Rad51-independent recombination. We propose that, during replication, the Slx5-Slx8 complex helps prevent DNA lesions that are acted upon by recombination. In addition, the complex inhibits Rad51-independent recombination via modulating the sumoylation of DNA repair proteins.The maintenance of genome stability is critical for cell survival and for the proper development of an organism. It requires a network of genes that must be coordinated during various DNA metabolic processes. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the SLX5 (or HEX3) and SLX8 genes are among the guardians of genomic stability. Originally identified as genes required for the viability of cells lacking Sgs1 (the homolog of human BLM and WRN), both SLX5 and SLX8 were subsequently shown to be required for the viability or fitness of many other strains with mutations that affect genomic integrity (29,31,40). Particularly, these genes exhibit extensive interactions with genes involved in replication or replication fork stability, such as RAD27, POL32, ELG1, and DBF2, suggesting a role for these genes in replication and/or repair (31). Consistent with this view, the deletion of SLX5 or SLX8 leads to a 150-to 200-fold increase in gross chromosomal rearrangement and a 4-fold increase in spontaneous mutation rates (48). These findings point to the importance of Slx5 and Slx8 in the maintenance of genome stability.Based on biochemical and genetic evidence, Slx5 and Slx8 proteins function as a complex (29,47,48). Several recent studies suggest that the Slx5-Slx8 complex participates in the sumoylation pathway, which entails the addition of a small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) to the target proteins. Sumoylation requires the sequential action of E1, E2, and E3 enzymes; while only a single E1 and a single E2 exist in previously studied organisms, multiple E3s have been found and are thought to confer ...

NUTM1-rearranged tumors are defined by the presence of a gene fusion between NUTM1 and various gene partners and typically follow a clinically aggressive disease course with poor outcomes despite conventional multimodality therapy. NUTM1-rearranged tumors display histologic features of a poorly differentiated carcinoma with areas of focal squamous differentiation and typically express the BRD4–NUTM1 fusion gene defining a distinct clinicopathologic entity—NUT carcinoma (NC). NCs with mesenchymal differentiation have rarely been described in the literature. In this report, we describe the characterization of two cases of high-grade spindle cell sarcoma harboring a novel MGA–NUTM1 fusion. Whole-genome sequencing identified the presence of complex rearrangements resulting in a MGA–NUTM1 fusion gene in the absence of other significant somatic mutations. Genetic rearrangement was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and expression of the fusion gene product was confirmed by transcriptomic analysis. The fusion protein was predicted to retain nearly the entire protein sequence of both MGA (exons 1–22) and NUTM1 (exons 3–8). Histopathologically, both cases were high-grade spindle cell sarcomas without specific differentiation markers. In contrast to typical cases of NC, these cases were successfully treated with aggressive local control measures (surgery and radiation) and both patients remain alive without disease. These cases describe a new subtype of NUTM1-rearranged tumors warranting expansion of diagnostic testing to evaluate for the presence of MGA–NUTM1 or alternative NUTM1 gene fusions in the diagnostic workup of high-grade spindle cell sarcomas or small round blue cell tumors of ambiguous lineage.