Tujuan umum penelitian ini adalah menghasilkan e-modul yang layak untuk melatih literasi sains peserta didik. Adapun tujuan khusus penelitian adalah mendeskripsikan validitas e-modul, kepraktisan e-modul dan efektivitas e-modul. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian & pengembangan dengan model ASSURE dan diujicobakan pada 36 peserta didik kelas XI MIPA 4 SMAN 8 Banjarmasin. Data dianalisis secara kuantitatif. Instrumen penelitian ini meliputi lembar validasi e-modul, angket respon peserta didik, dan tes hasil belajar. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa validitas e-modul memperoleh skor 3,41 dengan berkategori sangat valid, kepraktisan e-modul berdasarkan angket respon peserta didik memperoleh rata–rata 3,53 berkategori praktis dan efektivitas e-modul berdasarkan tes hasil belajar memperoleh skor N-Gain 0,41 yang berkategori efektif. Diperoleh simpulan bahwa e-modul menggunakan aplikasi exe-learning layak digunakan untuk melatih literasi sains peserta didik.The general objective of this research is to produce a viable e-module to train students' scientific literacy. This study's specific objectives are to describe the validity of the e-module, the practicality of the e-module, and the effectiveness of the e-module. This research & development type is research & development with the ASSURE model and was tested on 36 students of class XI MIPA 4 SMAN 8 Banjarmasin. Data were analyzed quantitatively. The research instruments included e-module validation sheets, student response questionnaires, and learning outcomes tests. The results of data analysis showed that the validity of the e-module obtained a score of 3.41 with a very valid category, the practicality of e-module based on the student response questionnaire obtained an average of 3.53 in the practical category, and the effectiveness of the e-module based on the test of learning outcomes obtained a score of N- Gain 0.41 which is categorized as effective. The conclusion was that the e-module using the exe-learning application was feasible to use to train students' scientific literacy.

The Kampus Merdeka lately becomes the center of attention for the education circle in Indonesia. The government via Indonesian Minister of education and culture believed that the Kampus Merdeka as an effort to freedom for the education system more supportive of students and lecturers in achieving quality learning meaningful to face the disruption of the current era. This paper presents the authors' views on "Kampus Merdeka" which was promoted by the Indonesian government. Also, the authors will underline the concept of "Kampus Merdeka" in accordance with Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy. From our point of view, we give a position this concept is developed based on the thinking of Paulo Freire. As we know, Freire's educational model offered a model of education for freedom. In this case, the term ‘freedom’ means a transformation in a real system that is competitively related and complex.

No abstract

No abstract

An integrated curriculum is an educational approach that prepares students to face lifelong learning. In curriculum integration, schools must view education as a process of developing the abilities needed in life, especially in facing 21st-century life challenges, not discrete subjects that are divided into different fields. Integrated learning will provide the opportunity for students to understand the complex problems that exist in the surrounding environment with a complete view. With this integrated learning, students are expected to have the ability to identify, gather, assess, and use information that is around them meaningfully. This can be obtained not only through the provision of new knowledge to students but also through the opportunity to strengthen and apply it in a variety of increasingly diverse new situations. The main focus of this article is to analyze the implementation of integrated learning in the curriculum in Indonesia. The integrated curriculum developed by Robin Fogarty has many advantages that can be adapted in the development of education in Indonesia, including the revised Curriculum 2013. Academics and practitioners must comprehensively understand the nature of the ten curriculum models (Robin Fogarty) and Curriculum 2013 before making tools and implementing them in learning.