No abstract

XpertMTB/RIF outperformed smear microscopy, established a diagnosis in a significant proportion of patients with smear-negative TB, detected many highly likely TB cases missed by culture, and accurately ruled out rifampicin-resistant TB. Sample-specific factors had limited impact on performance. Performance in patients infected with HIV, especially those with advanced immunosuppression, warrants further study.

Molecular testing is becoming an important part of the diagnosis of any patient with cancer. The challenge to laboratories is to meet this need, using reliable methods and processes to ensure that patients receive a timely and accurate report on which their treatment will be based. The aim of this paper is to provide minimum requirements for the management of molecular pathology laboratories. This general guidance should be augmented by the specific guidance available for different tumour types and tests. Preanalytical considerations are important, and careful consideration of the way in which specimens are obtained and reach the laboratory is necessary. Sample receipt and handling follow standard operating procedures, but some alterations may be necessary if molecular testing is to be performed, for instance to control tissue fixation. DNA and RNA extraction can be standardised and should be checked for quality and quantity of output on a regular basis. The choice of analytical method(s) depends on clinical requirements, desired turnaround time, and expertise available. Internal quality control, regular internal audit of the whole testing process, laboratory accreditation, and continual participation in external quality assessment schemes are prerequisites for delivery of a reliable service. A molecular pathology report should accurately convey the information the clinician needs to treat the patient with sufficient information to allow for correct interpretation of the result. Molecular pathology is developing rapidly, and further detailed evidence-based recommendations are required for many of the topics covered here.

Early clinical studies of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target the EGFR in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed that some patients experienced rapid, durable, complete or partial responses. These data were the basis for attempts to identify specific subgroups of patients who would further benefit from these agents. The discovery of somatic mutations in EGFR that correlated with sensitivity to TKIs identified a plausible explanation for these observations. Clinical and pathological factors such as female sex, never having smoked, Asian origin and adenocarcinoma histology correlate with the presence of EGFR mutations and objective responses to TKIs in patients with NSCLC. Recent studies in metastatic colorectal cancer highlighted that somatic mutations in KRAS represent a negative predictor of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies; KRAS mutations also represent an important mechanism of resistance to TKIs in NSCLC. Many large clinical studies are currently investigating the predictive and prognostic value of EGFR mutational status and other candidate biomarkers. We summarize the literature and present an overview of the field of anti-EGFR therapy in NSCLC, focusing on the influence of somatic EGFR mutations on selection of patients for TKI therapy and the influence of EGFR pathway regulation.

After completing this course, the reader will be able to:1. Summarize the main characteristics and findings of randomized controlled trials evaluating trastuzumab for the adjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer.2. Use combined-effect estimates provided by meta-analysis to appraise the risks and benefits of trastuzumab treatment in the adjuvant setting.3. Identify the links between basic science and drug development that led to the successful clinical use of trastuzumab, as well as the gaps in the existing evidence base regarding its use in breast cancer treatment.This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com. CME CME ABSTRACTBackground. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare treatment outcomes for human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab. Methods. We identified randomized clinical trials comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab in patients with resectable breast cancer. Fixed-effects meta-analysis was used to combine data.