The paper presents it numerical model for the analysis of the soil-structure kinematic interaction of single piles and pile groups embedded in layered soil deposits during seismic actions. A finite element model is considered for the pile group and the soil is assumed to be a Winkler-type medium. The pile-soil-pile interaction and the radiation problem are accounted for by means of elastodynarnic Green's functions. Condensation of the problem permits a consistent and straight forward derivation of both the impedance functions and the foundation input motion, which are necessary to perform the inertial soil-structure interaction analyses. The model proposed allows calculating the internal forces induced by soil-pile and pile-to-pile interaction,,. Comparisons with data available in literature are made to Study the convergence and validate the model. Ail application to a realistic pile foundation is given to demonstrate the potential of the model to catch the dynamic behaviour of the soil-foundation system and the stress resultants in each pile. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Soils, Ltd

Summary The paper presents a numerical model for the dynamic analysis of pile groups with inclined piles in horizontally layered soil deposits. Piles are modelled with Euler–Bernoulli beams, while the soil is supposed to be constituted by independent infinite viscoelastic horizontal layers. The pile–soil–pile interaction as well as the hysteretic and geometric damping is taken into account by means of two‐dimensional elastodynamic Green's functions. Piles cap is considered by introducing a rigid constraint; the condensation of the problem permits a consistent derivation of both the dynamic impedance matrix of the soil–foundation system and the foundation input motion. These quantities are those used to perform inertial soil–structure interaction analyses in the framework of the substructure approach. Furthermore, the model allows evaluating the kinematic stress resultants in piles resulting from waves propagating in the soil deposit, taking into account the pile–soil–pile interactions. The model validation is carried out by performing accuracy analyses and comparing results in terms of dynamic impedance functions, kinematic response parameters and pile stress resultants, with those furnished by 3D refined finite element models. To this purpose, classical elastodynamic solutions are adopted to define the soil–pile interaction problem. The model results in low computational demands without significant loss of precision, compared with more rigorous approaches or refined finite element models. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

No abstract

The effects of soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of multi-span bridges are investigated by means of a modelling strategy based on the domain decomposition technique. First, the analysis methodology is presented: kinematic interaction analysis is performed in the frequency domain by means of a procedure accounting for radiation damping, soil-pile and pile-to-pile interaction; the seismic response of the superstructure is evaluated in the time domain by means of user-friendly finite element programs introducing suitable lumped parameter models take into account the frequency-dependent impedances of the soil-foundation system. Second, a real multi-span railway bridge longitudinally restrained at one abutment is analyzed. The input motion is represented by two sets of real accelerograms: one consistent with the Italian seismic code and the other constituted by five records characterized by different frequency contents. The seismic response of the compliant-base model is compared with that obtained from a fixed-base model. Pile stress resultants due to kinematic and inertial interactions are also evaluated. The application demonstrates the importance of performing a comprehensive analysis of the soil-foundation-structure system in the design process, in order to capture the effects of soil-structure interaction in each structural element that may be beneficial or detrimental. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

No abstract