Examples of evidence-based guidelines for epilepsy care exist. However, guidelines are of little use if they are not recognised, implemented and supported. The object of this study was to establish the degree to which good practice guidelines for epilepsy have been implemented and to identify positive and negative factors that affect their implementation. Semi-structured questionnaires were sent to 750 randomly selected health professionals working in primary and secondary care in England. The sample comprised nurses (200), adult consultants (including learning disability consultants) (300), paediatric consultants (150) and general practitioners (100). Aspects of good practice are being implemented in some areas, but not generally, therefore service provision is likely to remain fragmented until this is addressed. Professionals have been prevented from successful implementation of guidelines to sustain good practice due to a number of factors, most notably lack of time, workload, competing priorities and staffing levels. Factors that have promoted and encouraged the successful adoption and application of good practice include inputs from epilepsy specialist nurses (ESNs), appropriate, timely and accessible professional development opportunities and the support and enthusiasm of colleagues.

In a time of clinical guidelines and National Service Frameworks (NSF), voluntary organizations and agencies strive to continue to influence the development of good practice for their service users. Representing 21 epilepsy charities throughout the UK, the Joint Epilepsy Council (JEC) is one such organization.