INTRODUCTION: Preeclampsia affects 3-5% of pregnancies with significant morbidity and mortality. Aspirin may reduce the risk of developing preeclampsia by up to 24%. Several organizations have created guidelines for initiation of aspirin therapy, each using different criteria. This study was designed to assess the impact of differing guidelines for aspirin use on maternal and fetal outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women who delivered between January 2009 and September 2010 with a diagnosis of preeclampsia with severe features was performed. Guidelines from six different OBGYN societies were applied to these patients to identify the percentage who met criteria for aspirin administration. Published risk reduction rates for preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and preterm birth were applied to estimate adjusted maternal and fetal outcomes. RESULTS: Of 153 deliveries with 173 neonates, 31 cases of IUGR (20%) and 107 cases of preterm births (70%) were identified. The Canadian society (SOGC) guideline identified 97% of our patients for aspirin therapy, while the remaining guidelines identified between 4-46% (P<.001) The SOGC was the only guideline to meet the published 24% reduction in cases of preeclampsia and 14% reduction of preterm birth with 35.3% and 14.3% reduction respectively. None of the guidelines reduced IUGR by the published 20% rate. CONCLUSION: The Canadian society’s guideline is comprehensive and captures more women who should start aspirin therapy. While these guidelines are beneficial for initiation of aspirin therapy, few of the published guidelines will effectively reduce rates of preeclampsia. Development of a more effective preventive treatment remains essential.

Background: Detection of unusual carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) in a healthcare facility may signify broader regional spread. During investigation of a VIM-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (VIM-CRPA) outbreak in a long-term acute-care hospital in central Florida, enhanced surveillance identified VIM-CRPA from multiple facilities, denoting potential regional emergence. We evaluated infection control and performed screening for CPOs in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) across the region to identify potential CPO reservoirs and improve practices. Methods: All SNFs in 2 central Florida counties were offered a facility-wide point-prevalence survey (PPS) for CPOs and a nonregulatory infection control consultation. PPSs were conducted using a PCR-based screening method; specimens with a carbapenemase gene detected were cultured to identify the organisms. Infection control assessments focused on direct observations of hand hygiene (HH), environmental cleaning, and the sink splash zone. Thoroughness of environmental cleaning was evaluated using fluorescent markers applied to 6 standardized high-touch surfaces in at least 2 rooms per facility. Results: Overall, 21 (48%) SNFs in the 2-county region participated; 18 conducted PPS. Bed size ranged from 40 to 391, 5 (24%) facilities were ventilator-capable SNFs (vSNFs), and 12 had short-stay inpatient rehabilitation units. Of 1,338 residents approached, 649 agreed to rectal screening, and 14 (2.2%) carried CPOs. CPO-colonized residents were from the ventilator-capable units of 3 vSNFs (KPC-CRE=7; KPC-CRPA=1) and from short-stay units of 2 additional facilities (VIM-CRPA, n = 5; KPC-CRE, n = 1). Among the 5 facilities where CPO colonization was identified, the prevalence ranged from 1.1% in a short-stay unit to 16.1% in a ventilator unit. All facilities had access to soap and water in resident bathrooms; 14 (67%) had alcohol-based hand rubs accessible. Overall, mean facility HH adherence was 52% (range, 37%–66%; mean observations per facility = 106) (Fig. 1). We observed the use of non–EPA-registered disinfectants and cross contamination from dirty to clean areas during environmental cleaning; the overall surface cleaning rate was 46% (n = 178 rooms); only 1 room had all 6 markers removed. Resident supplies were frequently stored in the sink splash zone. Conclusions: A regional assessment conducted in response to emergence of VIM-CRPA identified a relatively low CPO prevalence at participating SNFs; CPOs were primarily identified in vSNFs and among short-stay residents. Across facilities, we observed low adherence to core infection control practices that could facilitate spread of CPOs and other resistant organisms. In this region, targeting ventilator and short-stay units of SNFs for surveillance and infection control efforts may have the greatest prevention impact.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None