No abstract

L'accès aux articles des Cahiers GUTenberg (http://cahiers.gutenberg.eu.org/), implique l'accord avec les conditions générales d'utilisation (http://cahiers.gutenberg.eu.org/legal.html). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d'une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.

The number of publicly accessible digital editions is constantly growing, but only a relatively small percentage of them make their encoded source les openly available (Franzini 2016). Without the sources we cannot hope for the much-anticipated and commonly advertised re-use of all this painstakingly collected and prepared content in innovative research, visualization, and popularization. 1. "What is it Going to Look Like?" Many (or indeed most) digital editions are created by people whose scholarly background is in textual editing. Therefore, the encoding phase is perceived only as an unavoidable step towards the real goal: the published edition, be it printed or presented otherwise. For large digital scholarly editions, the bulk of the work is in researching and creating the underlying data, so editors sometimes think that after the encoding is complete, the rest should be trivial. At the same time, they brace themselves for the long struggle to get minute details of presentation just right. The question one hears most often during the encoding stage is: "What

L'accès aux articles des Cahiers GUTenberg (http://cahiers.gutenberg.eu.org/), implique l'accord avec les conditions générales d'utilisation (http://cahiers.gutenberg.eu.org/legal.html). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d'une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.

For many years the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) has maintained a specialised high-level XML vocabulary in the 'literate programming' paradigm to define its influential Guidelines, from which schemas or DTDs in other schema languages are derived. This paper reviews the development of this vocabulary, known as ODD (for 'One Document Does it all'). We discuss some problems with the language, and propose solutions to make it more complete and extensible.