The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 was designed to be a benchmark measure of knowledge and has been used heavily in the residency application process. Step 1 has moved from 3-digit scoring to a pass/fail scoring system, in part to decrease the stress associated with the exam. Emerging literature suggests that this transition has led to other stresses for students. Our study compared student stress levels, both overall and in relation to Step 1, leading up to the exam between a scored cohort and pass/fail cohort. We administered to each cohort a 14-item survey that included demographics, the PSS-4 stress scale, and 6 other potential stressors. Data was analyzed using two-tailed t test for independent means and analysis of variance. We found that while there was no difference in general overall stress between the students who took Step 1 for a score and students who took Step 1 pass/fail, we did see differences in stress related to the Step 1 exam. Step 1 stress was significantly lower for the pass/fail cohort than the score cohort during the second year of medical education leading up to the exam. However, this difference in Step 1 stress between the cohorts disappeared by the dedicated study period immediately before the exam. The change in scoring appears to have decreased stress specifically related to Step 1, but this reduction was not sustained as students entered their study period to prepare for Step 1.

Introduction: When deciding on which programs to rank or fellowships to enter, medical students and residents may assess the program's prestige and specialty training opportunities. This report aimed to analyze the demographics of orthopedic department chairs and program directors (PDs), focusing on the prestige of their orthopedic training and medical school. Secondary data included fellowship, higher-level education, sex, professorship, years of practice, and total published research.Methods: We used U.S. News and Doximity to rank 192 medical schools and 200 orthopedic residency programs based on prestige rankings, respectively. We searched for the department chair, vice-chair, and PD via program websites, Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors (CORD), Orthopedic Residency Information Network (ORIN), personal websites, LinkedIn, and Doximity. Subsequently, we searched for each individual's demographic information, education and research history, employment history, and medical school attended.Results: We gathered data on 268 orthopedic surgeons with leadership positions at academic hospitals. Of the 268, 115 were department chairs, 15 were vice-chairs, 126 were PDs, 11 were both the chair and PD, and one was vice-chair and PD. Of the 268 physicians, 244 physicians were male (91.0%), while 22 were female (9.0%). The average residency reputation ranking overall was 59.7 ± 5.7. More specifically, for chairs, the average was 57.0 ± 8.3 (p < 0.005), and for PDs, the average was 63.6 ± 8.0 (p <0.005). There was no significant difference between chairs and PDs (p = 0.26).Conclusion: Orthopedic leaders were found to have trained at more prestigious programs. This trend could be explained by increased research opportunities at more prestigious programs or programs attempting to increase their own reputation. 9.0% of the leaders identify as female, which is comparable to the 6.5% of practicing female orthopedic surgeons. However, this further demonstrates a need for gender equity in orthopedic surgery. Assessing trends in the training of orthopedic surgeons with leadership positions will allow a better understanding of what programs look for in the hiring process.

Background and Purpose Spinal arachnoid webs (SAWs) are rare and can present with myelopathic symptoms. This study aims to add 85 more cases of SAWs to the literature so we can continue to analyze clinical and imaging trends of SAWs to better understand this entity and its natural history. Methods An institutional review board‐approved retrospective review of SAW cases between 2016 and 2022 within a metropolitan, multihospital network was performed, searching for MR and CT reports that included “arachnoid web.” Of 108 identified reports, 85 patients had imaging and/or pathologically proven arachnoid webs. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Images were analyzed for SAW level, point of maximum kyphosis, presence of cord expansion, and signal intensity. The electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed for age, sex, symptom presentation and duration, management, and outcomes. Results Of 85 cases, the most common presenting chief complaint was back pain and weakness. All (100%) SAWs were in the dorsal thoracic subarachnoid space, with 87% (74/85) located from thoracic (T) 2 to T6. Spinal cord expansion and signal abnormality were present in 54.1% and 23.5%, respectively. Twenty‐six underwent surgical resection with 20 showing improvement of at least one symptom. Conclusion We present 85 additional cases of SAWs to the existing literature. Our cases all occurred in the dorsal thoracic subarachnoid space, predominantly from T2 to T6. Patients present with symptoms like other causes of cord compression, and spinal MR studies should be evaluated routinely for the findings of SAWs. Further research could focus on understanding SAW prevalence, risk factors, and pathophysiology.

Introduction When performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), surgeons may use either the mechanical alignment (MA) or the kinematic alignment (KA) to guide implant placement and joint balancing. By measuring preoperative and postoperative patellar height (PH), surgeons can predict knee stability after TKA. Improper PH is associated with knee instability which may complicate the postoperative course and lead to patient dissatisfaction or need for revision. The purpose of this study is to measure patellar height using the Insall-Salvati Index (ISI), Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI), and Blackburne-Peel Index (BPI) preoperatively and postoperatively in patients who underwent TKA with either MA or KA to assess for changes in patellar height. Methods We performed a retrospective eight-year review of 256 patients who underwent TKA with either MA or KA by a single surgeon at a single hospital site. We obtained demographic data, including gender, age, and BMI, via the electronic health record. Furthermore, we calculated the ISI, CDI, and BPI using necessary parameters from preoperative and postoperative radiographs. We used these measurements to assess any statistically significant difference in postoperative PH. Results The MA cohort consisted of 104 patients with an average age of 63 years and an average BMI of 34.1 kg/m 2 . The KA cohort included 152 patients with an average age of 64 years and an average BMI of 34.9 kg/m 2 . For the MA population, the average postoperative score with ISI was 1.10 [1.05 to 1.16] (p < 0.001), with CDI was 1.05 [0.98 to 1.11] (p < 0.001), and with BPI was was 0.94 [0.89 to 0.99] (p < 0.001). While for the KA population, the average postoperative score with ISI was 1.03 [0.99 to 1.06] (p = 0.17), with CDI was 0.87 [0.82 to 0.91] (p = 0.15), and with BPI was 0.82 [0.78 to 0.86] (p = 0.34). Conclusion TKA with a KA has a statistically significant improvement in postoperative PH and better postoperative maintenance of preoperative PH. Improved PH may lead to increased patellofemoral stability and superior postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing TKA. Future studies should focus on whether differences in preoperative and postoperative PH measurements result in changes in clinical outcomes in patients with MA versus KA TKA.

No abstract