No abstract

allowed ranking the regions of the Ural Federal District and identifying the areas of insufficient effectiveness in the organizational and administrative mechanism used for improving the population's quality of life as the basis for developing practical recommendations for the executive branch of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and adjustment of socioeconomic policies.Keywords: quality of life, organizational and administrative components of regional social infrastructure, infrasystemic principleThe focus of the economy of the Russian Federation and its regions on strengthening the social orientation requires studying the condition and development of interrelated processes in the social area, such as improving the level and performance of the infrastructure operation and the population's quality of life. The constituent entities of the Russian Federation differ by their objective characteristics (natural resources, climate, and geographic location) that virtually cannot be changed in the short term, which preserves the conditions for heterogeneity of Russian economic space. At the same time, a more active use of regional management capacity, including in the area of social infrastructure (in all variety of its sectoral forms, such as health care, education, culture, sport, and other infrastructure), allows improving the level of social services, public wellbeing, and social stability of the regions even in the short-term period.In the absence of radical shifts at the level of development and reduction of social space differentiation, the appearance of many publications and developed approaches to the classification of constituent entities of the Russian Federation in terms of their provision with the social infrastructure 1