The kinetic energy produced by a turbofan engine is inseparable from the unavoidable generation of waste heat dissipated into the environment and the chemical exergy of exhaust gases. However, exergoeconomic cost analyses of these propulsion systems have focused only on the formation process of the functional product and not the cost of residue formation. In this study, symbolic thermoeconomics was applied to evaluate the impact of residue formation on the production costs of a turbofan engine and analyze the effect of component malfunctions on the fuel impact formula for diagnosing anomalies. The GE90-115B high bypass turbofan engine under takeoff conditions and a thrust requirement of 510 kN was considered as a case study. The total exergoeconomic cost of the engine was 26,754.28 USD/h: 61.04% corresponded to external resources; 0.14% and 33.07% corresponded to waste heat dissipated from the bypass and core engine, respectively; 3.28% corresponded to the chemical exergy of the exhaust gases; 2.47% corresponded to capital and operating costs. A malfunction analysis revealed that a 1% reduction in the isentropic efficiency of the compressor reduced the total kinetic exergy by −0.77 MW, increased fuel consumption by 0.49 MW, and generated irreversibility and residue of 0.80 and 0.45 MW, respectively.

In an energy system, it is important to identify the origin of residue formation in order to implement actions to reduce their formation or to eliminate them as well as to evaluate their impact on the production costs of the system. In the exergetic cost theory, although there are several criteria to allocate the cost formation of residues to the productive components, no unique indication on the best choice has been defined yet. In this paper, the production exergy costs are determined by allocating the residue cost formation to the irreversibilities of the productive components from which they originate. This criterion, based on the Gouy–Stodola theorem, is an extension of the criterion of entropy changes, and unlike this, it avoids the existence of a negative production cost. This criterion is applied to a combined cycle of three pressure levels, and the production exergy costs are compared with the criteria of entropy changes, distributed exergy, and entropy. The results of the proposed criterion are in agreement with the compared criteria.

Nowadays, in Mexico, most of the installed electricity generation capacity corresponds to combined cycles, representing 37.1%. For this reason, it is important to maintain these cycles in good operating conditions, with the least environmental impacts. An exergoeconomic and environmental analysis is realized to compare the operation of the combined cycle, with and without postcombustion, with the comparison of exergoeconomic and environmental indicators. With the productive structure of the energy system, the process of formation of the final products and the residues are identified, and an allocation criterion is also used to impute the formation cost of residue to the productive components related to its formation. This criterion considers the irreversibilities generated in each productive component that participates in the formation of a residue. The compositions of pollutant gases emitted are obtained, and their environmental impact is determined. The unit exergoeconomic cost of the power output in the gas turbine is lower in the combined cycle with postcombustion, indicating greater efficiency in the process of obtaining this energy stream, and the environmental indicators of global warming, smog formation and acid rain formation are higher in the combined cycle with postcombustion, these differences being 5.22%, 5.53% and 5.30%, respectively.

In this study, we used the thermoeconomic theory to evaluate the impact of residue cost formation on the cost of electricity generated from natural gas burned in a gas turbine that applied sequential combustion; we also analyzed the impact of the combustion process on the additional fuel consumption to compensate for a malfunction component. We used the Alstom GT24 gas turbine, which applied sequential combustion and generated 235 MW of power. Thermoeconomic analysis indicated that the exergy cost of power generation was 626.33 MW (30.42% corresponded to irreversibility costs, and 29.22% and 2.84% corresponded to the formation costs of physical and chemical residues, respectively). The exergoeconomic production cost of gas turbine was 10,098.71 USD/h, 34.76% from external resources and 65.24% from capital and operating costs. Thermoeconomic diagnosis revealed that a compressor deterioration (of 1-% drop in the isentropic efficiency) resulted in an additional fuel consumption of 4.05 MW to compensate for an increase in irreversibilities (1.97 MW) and residues (2.08 MW); the compressor generated the highest cost (49.9% of additional requirement). Thus, our study can identify the origin of anomalies in a gas-turbine system and explain their effects on the rest of the components.

del CONACyT y cuenta con apoyo del mismo Consejo con el convenio 003893; por lo que agradece la beca recibida, a través del convenio No. 303662 para el desarrollo de esta tesis. Agradecimientos personales A diosPor haberme permitido llegar hasta este punto y haberme dado salud para lograr mis objetivos. A mi madre AraceliPor haberme apoyado en todo momento, por sus consejos, sus valores, por la motivación constante que me ha permitido ser una persona de bien, pero más que nada, por su amor. A mi padre JoséPor los ejemplos de perseverancia y constancia que lo caracteriza y que me ha infundido siempre, por el valor mostrado para salir adelante y por su amor. A mis familiaresA mi hermano Omar y su esposa Elizabeth por alentarme a seguir adelante, a mi hermana Arlem por su gran apoyo en momentos difícil, a mis sobrinos Ángel, Tadeo y Melanie por darme momentos de alegría, a mis abuelos Cirilo y Natividad, a mis tíos Francisco, Serafín, Sandra, Ana y Eugenio, a mis primos Francisco, Gustavo y Guadalupe. A mi director de tesisDr. Raúl Lugo Leyte por su apoyo, compresión, paciencia y por invertir su tiempo en el desarrollo de esta investigación. A mis profesoresAl M. en I.Q. Alejandro y la Dra. Helen por su apoyo y contribución a este trabajo.