Biomaterials
need to be vigorously tested at every stage of preclinical
development. As demand for in vivo culture environments
continues to increase, traditional animal models are often technically
complex, ethically undesirable, time-consuming, and resource intensive
and thus present a barrier to high throughput screening. The chick
chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay has long been used to study the
effects of drugs on angiogenesis in vivo, providing
researchers with a readily available, accessible, self-sustaining,
and high throughput screen without requiring animal facilities. It
has also been recognized as an in vivo assay to test
initial tissue response to biomaterials; however it has not yet gained
widespread acceptance. This could be due to lack of specific protocols
on how to optimize this assay to specifically test biomaterials. Here
we describe how the ex ovo (shell-less) CAM assay
can be effectively used to study the angiogenic potential and initial
tissue response to biomaterials. In comparison to alternative in vivo approaches, this technique provides additional advantages
to the researcher as it allows better visualization of implanted biomaterials
and the ability to implant several samples simultaneously enabling
combinatorial biomaterial assays to be conducted.
Guided bone regeneration is a common dental implant treatment where a barrier membrane (BM) is used between epithelial tissue and bone or bone graft to prevent the invasion of the fast-proliferating epithelial cells into the defect site to be able to preserve a space for infiltration of slower-growing bone cells into the periodontal defect site. In this study, a bilayer polycaprolactone (PCL) BM was developed by combining electrospinning and emulsion templating techniques. First, a 250 µm thick polymerised high internal phase emulsion (polyHIPE) made of photocurable PCL was manufactured and treated with air plasma, which was shown to enhance the cellular infiltration. Then, four solvent compositions were investigated to find the best composition for electrospinning a nanofibrous PCL barrier layer on PCL polyHIPE. The biocompatibility and the barrier properties of the electrospun layer were demonstrated over four weeks in vitro by histological staining. Following in vitro assessment of cell viability and cell migration, cell infiltration and the potential of PCL polyHIPE for supporting blood vessel ingrowth were further investigated using an ex-ovo chick chorioallantoic membrane assay. Our results demonstrated that the nanofibrous PCL electrospun layer was capable of limiting cell infiltration for at least four weeks, while PCL polyHIPE supported cell infiltration, calcium and mineral deposition of bone cells, and blood vessel ingrowth through pores.
Aim:In this study, we explored the angiogenic potential and proangiogenic concentration ranges of 2deoxy-D-ribose (2dDR) and -Estradiol (E2) in comparison with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). 2dDR and E2 were then loaded into tissue engineering (TE) scaffolds to investigate their proangiogenic potential when released from fibres. Materials and Methods: Ex-ovo chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay was used to evaluate angiogenic activity of 2dDR and E2. Both factors were then introduced into scaffolds via electrospinning to assess their angiogenic potential when released from fibres. Results: Both factors were approximately 80% as potent as (VEGF) and showed a dose-dependent angiogenic response. The sustained release of both agents from the scaffolds stimulated neovascularisation over 7 days in the CAM assay. Conclusion: We conclude that both 2dDR and E2 provide attractive alternatives to VEGF for the functionalisation of TE scaffolds to promote angiogenesis in vivo.
Graphical abstract:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.