No abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the evaluation of radiation protection principles observance in dental radiography centers and hazards. This cross-sectional study was designed to assess level of radiation protection principles in dentistry centers. The present cross-sectional study was conducted by enrolling 103 dentistry centers in Kermanshah province (west of Iran). Our finding illustrates 75.7% of the centers were equipped with an intraoral radiography. Although observance principles of radiation protection for patient at dentistry center were at appropriate level (97.3%), the observance of the protective principles was not adequate for the skilled workers in any center. The most commonly used protective measure was the observance of a distance from patient (97.3%) and the minimum protective measures such as the use of high-speed film (1.4%). According to results in this study, the knowledge and practice of radiation protection are not satisfactory.

Background and purpose: Radiographic techniques are essential methods of diagnosis, and their use has been increased, especially with the development of the new technologies. Inappropriate administration of these techniques may put both the patients and personnel at unnecessary risks. The objective of this research was to measure the skin dose of chest and skull radiographies used in Mazandaran hospitals and to compare these doses with national and international standards.Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, six X-ray generators at six hospitals affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences were included. One hundred and twenty patients referred to the radiology wards for radiographic examinations of chest and skull with normal body mass index (BMI) were selected (20 patients for each radiography unit). The generators were matched for mAs, kvp, type of amplifier sheets, and technical conditions as much as possible. Calibrated thermo luminescence dosimeters (TLD-USA, Lif-100) were used to measure the skin dose by placing them on the patients' back and the absorbed doses by TLDs were read by a TLD reader (model: Harshuu, TLD3500, Japan).Results: The mean values of the skin dose were 0.51 mGray for posteroanterior (PA), chest X-ray (CXR), 3.36 mGray for lateral CXR, 7.25 mGray for anterroposterior (AP) or PA skull X-rays, and 7.59 mGray for lateral skull X-rays. The measured values were higher than the national and international standards.Conclusion: The results of this research revealed that the conditions of the X-ray generators should be monitored and modified periodically. Modifying the X-ray generators plus improving technicians' skills would, to some extent, reduce the radiation exposure of the patients.

Background and purpose:To present the results of occupational radiation doses investigated through a Hospitals of Mazandaran Medical Science Universities in north of Iran. Radiology unit has an important role in diagnosis of many disorders with providing suitable and high quality pictures. A good picture was provided using correct technical criteria and suitable circumstance of patient. Finally, operation and knowledge of radiology personnel directly has a primary role in determining quality of radiography.Materials and Methods:This study was done in order to determine personnel operation in the units of hospitals radiologist related to University of Mazandaran Medical Science. Data collection tools are made of a researcher check list that was used after obtaining suitable letter and validity indexes. All of the 73 personnel of radiology unit related to Mazandaran Medical Science were studied. 35 operations (in technical, protective and technological fields) of any personnel, in three distinct shifts were observed and recorded. All of them were tested regarding these three fields with a total of 40 questions.Results:The total scores received from personnel in technical part in the morning, evening and night shift were 66.4, 53.9 and 60.2 percent respectively. Received scores from personnel in the protective fields were 68.1, 59.5 and 60.2 percent. Moreover, received scores from personnel in the technological operation fields were 47.8, 39.95 and 43.65 percent respectively. Comparison of these three scores in technical, protective and technological operation fields showed a meaningful difference (p<0.05).Conclusion:The overall quality of personnel operations were nearly desirable and in need of continuous education, supervision and evaluation. Emphasizing protection to beams, accessibility of necessary tools, continuous supervision regarding the usage of these equipments and respecting the other security points have an important role in decreasing patients absorbed doses.

No abstract