Medical record is a record or document containing patient identity, examination, treatment, action, and other services that must be made by health workers, but not 100% complete medical records. Currently, when talking about medical records, doctors always think that in the law on health workers, medical records must be made by health workers. Purpose/Objective Study:To analyze the legal consistency of health workers in making medical records. Design/Methodology/Approach: This research method is a normative combination of library studies with deductive research analysis. Findings: The results of patient records carried out by the medical profession are called medical records, patient records carried out by nurses are called nursing care documentation, and patient records carried out by midwives are called midwifery care documentation. Doctors who do not make medical records can get criminal sanctions, while nurses and midwives will get administrative sanctions if they do not do documentation of care. There is a consistency of laws that require doctors, dentists, nursing, and midwives to make medical records, albeit in different terms. There has been no consistency of laws governing sanctions between doctors, dentists, nurses, and midwives. Further study is needed to evaluate the legal products governing sanctions for health workers who do not make medical records.

The testimony of witnesses as one of the most important proofs of a lawsuit is effective in both court and arbitration cases. This article examines the acceptance of witness testimony and its process in cyberspace, as well as how intuition is Challenge in Iranian law and some legal systems. In this article, which has been done by descriptive-analytical method. The authors intend to discuss the Hearing the testimony of witnesses in cyberspace arbitration comparatively in US, European and Iranian arbitration systems. And in continuation of the legal and judicial validity of this method of hearing testimony, as well as how to denial witnesses, and finally the opportunities and challenges in the process of hearing witnesses in cyberspace arbitration should be examined.

The various aspects of the rights of women in the family and society have not been elucidated and explicated in terms of Islamic law and jurisprudence up to now. In this legal system, the spouses will have rights and responsibilities relating to each other following the conclusion of the marriage contract; however, since the wife does have economic independence, she is liable to receive wage and remuneration in lieu of what she does as per the implicit or explicit request of her husband.

Sometimes either of the spouses might have abomination or marital misconduct towards the other. This deed which leads to problems in marital relationships is called nushuz, or lack of submission, and can be from either the husband or the wife. Nushuz is the mostly observed factor in divorce so its prevention can save the family break-up. The purpose of this article is to describe the possible mechanism available in this area. The holy Quran also offers some solutions to remove the problems of marital misconducts which cause damage to the family foundation by making the husband primarily responsible for reforming the family prima, and has presented conventional practices. To avoid any kind of damage to the family foundation the husband should practice admonishment and banishment. However, it should not cause bruises on her body or lead to a more strained relationship. Moreover, if the wife is nashiza (rebellious), selecting arbiters from among relatives of the spouses can solve any problem which had led to nushuz and lack of submission. We will discuss the process of reforming the family after an instance of nushuz, which is essential in bringing the relationship back to normal.