The President of the United States, with the approval of the US Senate, appoints Supreme Court justices, as well as court of appeals and district judges. Judicial nominations are often a centerpiece of a President's legacy. Always with a complex calculi of presidential goals, nominee characteristics, institutional constraints and opportunity, Presidents have sought to balance their own policy preferences with the need to diversify the bench. This article examines the political ascension of Hispanic female judges to the Texas federal judiciary. I illuminate dynamics that structure hierarchies on the basis of race and gender. I advance an account of race-gendering as a political process that silences, stereotypes, enforces invisibility, excludes and challenges Hispanic women's ascension into the judiciary. Race-gendering constitutes a form of interested bias operating in the judiciary, which has important implications for the understanding of the internal operations of political institutions and the representation of a historically underrepresentated group, and their incorporation into the federal judiciary.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.