The Arabidopsis genome encodes a family of inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate 5/6-kinases which form a subgroup of a larger group of ATP-grasp fold proteins. An analysis of the inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate 5/6-kinase family might, ultimately, be best rewarded by detailed comparison of related enzymes in a single genome. The enzyme encoded by At2G43980, AtITPK4; is an outlier to its family. At2G43980 is expressed in male and female organs of young and mature flowers. AtITPK4 differs from other family members in that it does not display inositol 3,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate 1-kinase activity; rather, it displays inositol 1,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate and inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate isomerase activity.

The metabolic pathway(s) by which plants synthesize InsP6 (inositol 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate) remains largely undefined [Shears (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1436, 49-67], while the identities of the genes that encode enzymes catalysing individual steps in these pathways are, with the notable exception of myo-inositol phosphate synthase and ZmIpk [Shi, Wang, Wu, Hazebroek, Meeley and Ertl (2003) Plant Physiol. 131, 507-515], unidentified. A yeast enzyme, ScIPK1, catalyses the synthesis of InsP6 by 2-phosphorylation of Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 (inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate). A human orthologue, HsIPK1, is able to substitute for yeast ScIPK1, restoring InsP6 production in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant strain lacking the ScIPK1 open reading frame (ScIpk1Delta). We have identified an Arabidopsis genomic sequence, AtIPK1, encoding an Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 2-kinase. Inclusion of the AtIPK1 protein in alignments of amino acid sequences reveals that human and Arabidopis kinases are more similar to each other than to the S. cerevisiae enzyme, and further identifies an additional motif. Recombinant AtIPK1 protein expressed in Escherichia coli catalysed the synthesis of InsP6 from Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5. The enzyme obeyed Michaelis-Menten kinetics with an apparent V(max) of 35 nmol x min(-1) x (mg of protein)(-1) and a K(m) for Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5 of 22 microM at 0.4 mM ATP. RT (reverse transcriptase)-PCR analysis of AtIPK1 transcripts revealed that AtIPK1 is expressed in siliques, leaves and cauline leaves. In situ hybridization experiments further revealed strong expression of AtIPK1 in male and female organs of flower buds. Expression of AtIPK1 protein in an ScIpk1Delta mutant strain restored InsP6 production and rescued the temperature-sensitive growth phenotype of the yeast.

Mutants of Pisum sativum L. with seeds containing low‐amylose starch were isolated by screening a population derived from chemically mutagenized material. In all of the mutant lines selected, the low‐amylose phenotype was caused by a recessive mutation at a single locus designated lam. In embryos of all but one mutant line, the 59 kDa granule‐bound starch synthase (GBSSI) was absent or greatly reduced in amount. The granule‐bound starch synthase activity in developing embryos of the mutants was reduced but not eliminated. These results provide further evidence that amylose synthesis is unique to GBSSI. Other granule‐bound isoforms of starch synthase cannot substitute for this protein in amylose synthesis. Examination of iodine‐stained starch granules from mutant embryos by light microscopy revealed large, blue‐staining cores surrounded by a pale‐staining periphery. In this respect, the low‐amylose mutants of pea differ from those of other species. The differential staining may indicate that the structure of amylopectin varies between the core and peripheral regions.

No abstract