Purpose:
To study the agreement of findings of glaucoma screening between trained vision center (VC) technicians and glaucoma specialists in patients referred from VC to the glaucoma services of a tertiary eye care hospital in south India.
Methods:
This was a retrospective study comparing the findings of the VC technicians and the specialists of the glaucoma services in the base hospital, in patients referred from 13 VCs between January and June 2019. Medical records of 277 referred patients (out of 533 referrals) who attended the glaucoma clinic were analyzed.
Results:
Of the 277 patients, 111 (40%) were confirmed having glaucoma, 133 (48%) were suspects, 29 (10.4%) were normal, and four (1.4%) had other pathology. The mean age of the patients was 59.7 ± 13 years and 60.6% were females. There was no statistically significant difference between the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) measured (17 ± 7.2 mmHg at the VC and 18 ± 8.7 mmHg at the clinic, p = 0.16) and the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) (0.7 ± 0.13 at the VC and 0.6 ± 0.18 at the clinic, p = 0.57). Bland–Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement supported that mean differences were close to zero, and the intraclass correlation coefficient at 95% CI showed good consistency between the measurement of IOP (0.78 [0.74 to 0.81]) and CDR (0.90 [0.88 to 0.92]) at the base hospital and vision center.
Conclusion:
There is good agreement between the findings of VC technicians and glaucoma specialists. VC technicians can help in detecting glaucoma in the community.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.