No abstract

Background: One of the major controversies surrounding the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in type 2 diabetes is whether its single components act synergistically as risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease (AVD). We aimed to answer this by evaluating the relationship, and its various combinations to AVD in comparison to single traits in a population-based study with type 2 diabetes in Germany.

Aim To evaluate the long‐term efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin. Materials and Methods A 104‐week Phase III, randomized double‐blind study with a 26‐week placebo‐controlled period (Phase A) and a 78‐week period (Phase B) where blinded glimepiride was added to non‐rescued placebo participants with fasting fingerstick glucose ≥6.1 mmol/L. Results through week 104 are reported. Results Mean (standard error) change in HbA1c from baseline was −0.7% (0.07) and −1.0% (0.07) at week 52; −0.6% (0.08) and −0.9% (0.08) at week 104 for ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg. At week 52, 34.8% and 36.6% participants had HbA1c <7.0%, and 24.6% and 33.7% at week 104, for ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg. Ertugliflozin reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight and systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline through week 104. The incidence of female genital mycotic infections (GMIs) was higher with ertugliflozin, and symptomatic hypoglycaemia was lower for ertugliflozin versus placebo/glimepiride. Minimal bone mineral density (BMD) changes were observed, similar to placebo/glimepiride, except at total hip where reduction in BMD was greater with ertugliflozin 15 mg versus placebo/glimepiride: difference in least squares means (95% CI) –0.50% (−0.95, −0.04) at week 52 and −0.84% (−1.44, −0.24) at week 104. Conclusions Ertugliflozin maintained improvements from baseline in HbA1c, FPG, body weight and SBP through week 104. Ertugliflozin was well tolerated, with non‐clinically relevant changes in BMD. Compared with placebo/glimepiride, ertugliflozin increased female GMIs, but reduced the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycaemia. http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02033889.

Background: This pooled analysis assessed the efficacy of ertugliflozin versus placebo as monotherapy or with other antihyperglycaemic agents across patient subgroups defined by demographic and disease characteristics. Methods: Data from three phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies (NCT01958671, NCT02033889 and NCT02036515) with similar designs and populations were pooled ( N = 1544). Results: At Week 26, placebo-adjusted least squares mean changes from baseline in glycated haemoglobin with ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg were −0.8% (95% confidence interval: −0.9, −0.7) and −0.9% (–1.0, −0.8), respectively. Reductions were consistent across subgroups. Placebo-adjusted least squares mean changes in body weight were −1.8 kg (−2.2, −1.4) for both ertugliflozin doses; for systolic blood pressure, these were −3.4 mmHg (−4.8, −2.0) and −3.5 mmHg (−4.9, −2.0) for ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg, respectively. Higher proportions of patients receiving ertugliflozin had glycated haemoglobin <7.0%, weight loss ⩾5% and systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg versus placebo. Ertugliflozin and placebo safety profiles were similar, including incidences of hypoglycaemia, urinary tract infection and hypovolaemia. Genital mycotic infection and adverse events related to osmotic diuresis were more common with ertugliflozin. Conclusion: Ertugliflozin demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy or with other antihyperglycaemic agents in patients with different demographic and disease characteristics and was generally well tolerated.

Objective This study aimed to evaluate ertugliflozin in patients with overweight and obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods Data from three placebo‐controlled, randomized, Phase 3 studies were pooled. Patients with baseline BMI ≥ 25 (1,377/1,544; 89%) were assessed with a stratification by BMI subgroup. Results At week 26, reductions from baseline in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, body weight (BW), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were greater with ertugliflozin versus placebo. For placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively, least squares mean change was 0.1%, −0.8%, and −0.9% for HbA1c and −1.2 kg, −3.1 kg, and −3.2 kg for BW. HbA1c reductions were consistent across BMI subgroups. For ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg, least squares mean change (placebo adjusted) in absolute BW was −1.4 kg and −1.2 kg for BMI 25 to < 30, −1.8 kg and −1.9 kg for BMI 30 to < 35, and −2.5 kg and −2.9 kg for BMI ≥ 35. Percent BW changes were similar across BMI subgroups. Incidence of adverse events was 52.5%, 44.6%, and 50.1% with placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively. Conclusions Meaningful reductions in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, BW, and SBP were observed with ertugliflozin in patients with overweight and obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ertugliflozin improved HbA1c and SBP and reduced BW across BMI subgroups. Ertugliflozin was generally well tolerated.