No abstract

Background-The use of coronary angiography (CA) for diagnosis and management of chest pain (CP) has several flaws.The assessment of coronary artery disease using fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a well-validated technique for describing lesion-level ischemia and improves clinical outcome in the context of percutaneous coronary intervention. The impact of routine FFR at the time of diagnostic CA on patient management has not been determined. Methods and Results-Two hundred patients with stable CP underwent CA for clinical indications. The supervising cardiologist (S.C.) made a management plan based on CA (optimal medical therapy alone, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or more information required) and also recorded which stenoses were significant. An interventional cardiologist then measured FFR in all patent coronary arteries of stentable diameter (≥2.25 mm). S.C. was then asked to make a second management plan when FFR results were disclosed. Overall, after disclosure of FFR data, management plan based on CA alone was changed in 26% of patients, and the number and localization of functional stenoses changed in 32%. Specifically, of 72 cases in which optimal medical therapy was recommended after CA, 9 (13%) were actually referred for revascularization with FFR data. By contrast, of 89 cases in whom management plan was optimal medical therapy based on FFR, revascularization would have been recommended in 25 (28%) based on CA. Conclusions-Routine measurement of FFR at CA has important influence both on which coronary arteries have significant stenoses and on patient management. These findings could have important implications for clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrial.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01070771.(Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:248-255.)

No abstract

Research ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of multiecho T2* mapping of the heart for detecting reperfusion hemorrhage following percutaneous primary coronary intervention (PPCI) for acute myocardial infarction, and to measure the effect of hemorrhage on quantifying the ischemic area at risk (IAR) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Fifteen patients (mean age, 59 years; 13 men, two women) were imaged a mean of 3.2 days following PPCI. The mean area of hemorrhage, indicated by a T2* decay constant of less than 20 msec, was 5.0% +/- 4.9 (standard deviation) at the level of the infarct and this correlated with the infarct (r(2) = 0.76, P < .01) and microvascular obstruction (r(2) = 0.75, P < .01) volumes. When 5% or less hemorrhage was present, the IAR was underestimated by 50% at a standard deviation threshold level of five, compared with a boundary detection tool (21.8% vs 44.0%, P < .05). T2* mapping is feasible for quantifying post-reperfusion hemorrhage and boundary detection is required to accurately assess the IAR when hemorrhage is present.

Focal restenosis remains the most common pattern with SES. In contrast, just under half of restenosis in PES is the more severe non-focal pattern. Paradoxically, the majority of focal restenosis occurs at the proximal stent margin for both platforms.