Summary Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients receiving anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents can help optimise outcomes. Consensus statements based on current evidence will help the development of treatment guidelines. Aim To develop evidence‐based consensus statements for TDM‐guided anti‐TNF therapy in IBD. Methods A committee of 25 Australian and international experts was assembled. The initial draft statements were produced following a systematic literature search. A modified Delphi technique was used with 3 iterations. Statements were modified according to anonymous voting and feedback at each iteration. Statements with 80% agreement without or with minor reservation were accepted. Results 22/24 statements met criteria for consensus. For anti‐TNF agents, TDM should be performed upon treatment failure, following successful induction, when contemplating a drug holiday and periodically in clinical remission only when results would change management. To achieve clinical remission in luminal IBD, infliximab and adalimumab trough concentrations in the range of 3‐8 and 5‐12 μg/mL, respectively, were deemed appropriate. The range may differ for different disease phenotypes or treatment endpoints—such as fistulising disease or to achieve mucosal healing. In treatment failure, TDM may identify mechanisms to guide subsequent decision‐making. In stable clinical response, TDM‐guided dosing may avoid future relapse. Data indicate drug‐tolerant anti‐drug antibody assays do not offer an advantage over drug‐sensitive assays. Further data are required prior to recommending TDM for non‐anti‐TNF biological agents. Conclusion Consensus statements support the role of TDM in optimising anti‐TNF agents to treat IBD, especially in situations of treatment failure.

No abstract

ObjectiveFaecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proved to be an extremely effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, and there is interest in its potential application in other gastrointestinal and systemic diseases. However, the recent death and episode of septicaemia following FMT highlights the need for further appraisal and guidelines on donor evaluation, production standards, treatment facilities and acceptable clinical indications.DesignFor these consensus statements, a 24-member multidisciplinary working group voted online and then convened in-person, using a modified Delphi approach to formulate and refine a series of recommendations based on best evidence and expert opinion. Invitations to participate were directed to Australian experts, with an international delegate assisting the development. The following issues regarding the use of FMT in clinical practice were addressed: donor selection and screening, clinical indications, requirements of FMT centres and future directions. Evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.ResultsConsensus was reached on 27 statements to provide guidance on best practice in FMT. These include: (1) minimum standards for donor screening with recommended clinical selection criteria, blood and stool testing; (2) accepted routes of administration; (3) clinical indications; (4) minimum standards for FMT production and requirements for treatment facilities acknowledging distinction between single-site centres (eg, hospital-based) and stool banks; and (5) recommendations on future research and product development.ConclusionsThese FMT consensus statements provide comprehensive recommendations around the production and use of FMT in clinical practice with relevance to clinicians, researchers and policy makers.