Background Grade 3 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma is an uncommon primary CNS tumor with a high rate of progression and recurrence. This study examines the benefit of surgery after progression and identifies predictors of survival. Methods This is a single-institution retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients with anaplastic or grade 3 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma diagnosed between 2001-2020. Results 80 patients with 1p/19q co-deleted grade 3 oligodendroglioma were included. The median age was 47 years (interquartile range 38–56) and 38.8% were women. All patients underwent surgery, including gross total resection (GTR) for 26.3% of patients, subtotal resection for 70.0% of patients, and biopsy for 3.8% of patients. 43 cases (53.8%) progressed at a median of 5.6 years, and the median OS was 14.1 years. Amongst 43 cases of progression or recurrence, 21 (48.8%) underwent another resection. Patients who underwent a second operation had improved overall survival (p=0.041) and survival after progression/recurrence (p=0.012), but similar time to subsequent progression as patients who did not have repeat surgery (p=0.50). Predictors of mortality at initial diagnosis included a pre-operative KPS under 80 (HR 5.4; 95%CI 1.5-19.2), an STR or biopsy rather than GTR (HR 4.1; 95% CI 1.2-14.2), and a persistent post-operative neurologic deficit (HR 4.0; 95%CI 1.2-14.1). Conclusions Repeat surgery is associated with increased survival, but not time to subsequent progression for progressing or recurrent 1p/19q co-deleted grade 3 oligodendrogliomas recur. Mortality is associated with a pre-operative KPS under 80, lack of GTR, and persistent post-operative neurologic deficits after the initial surgery.
Introduction: Analgesia and sedation are integral to the care of critically ill children.However, the choice and dose of the analgesic or sedative drug is often empiric, and models predicting favorable responses are lacking. We aimed to compute models to predict a patient's response to intravenous morphine. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive patients admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (January 2011-January 2020) who received at least one intravenous bolus of morphine. The primary outcome was a decrease in the State Behavioral Scale (SBS) ≥1 point; the secondary outcome was a decrease in the heart rate Z-score (zHR) at 30 min. Effective doses were modeled using logistic regression, Lasso regression, and random forest modeling. Results: A total of 117,495 administrations of intravenous morphine among 8140 patients (median age 0.6 years [interquartile range [IQR] 0.19, 3.3]) were included.The median morphine dose was 0.051 mg/kg (IQR 0.048, 0.099) and the median 30day cumulative dose was 2.2 mg/kg (IQR 0.4, 15.3). SBS decreased following 30% of doses, did not change following 45%, and increased following 25%. The zHR significantly decreased after morphine administration (median delta-zHR −0.34 [IQR−1.03, 0.00], p < 0.001). The following factors were associated with favorable response to morphine: A concomitant infusion of propofol, higher prior 30-day cumulative dose, being invasively ventilated and/or on vasopressors. Higher morphine dose, higher zHR pre-morphine, an additional analgosedation bolus ±30 min around the index bolus, a concomitant ketamine or dexmedetomidine infusion, and showing signs of withdrawal syndrome were associated with unfavorable response. Logistic regression (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve [AUC] 0.900) and machine learning models (AUC 0.906) performed comparably, with a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 71%, and negative predictive value of 97%.Conclusions: Statistical models identify 95% of effective intravenous morphine doses in pediatric critically ill cardiac patients, while incorrectly suggesting an effective dose in 29% of cases. This work represents an important step toward computer-aided, personalized clinical decision support tool for sedation and analgesia in ICU patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.